My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 11:37:59 AM
Creation date
3/2/2021 10:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chart 1— Study Corridor Volume to Capacity <br />Congested: volume/capacity of 1.0 <br />0 <br />ro <br />0.8 <br />U <br />fB <br />Q <br />v 0.6 <br />0 <br />(1) <br />5 0.4 <br />0 <br />0.2 <br />-EI <br />HWY 10 E of HWY 10 W of Bowers Drive Llama Street Riverdale Dr Armstrong Blvd Armstrong Blvd <br />Bowers Dr Bowers Dr btwn Llama St S of HWY 10 N N of HWY 10 N <br />& HWY 10 S Ramps Ramps <br />Ramps <br />Existing 2022 No -Build 2022 Build 2040 No -Build ■ 2040 Build <br />b. Intersection Vehicular Analysis <br />Individual intersections can perform poorly during peak periods while the overall <br />roadway corridor is operating with an uncongested daily volume to capacity ratio <br />lower than 1.0. Therefore, capacity analyses are performed for the study <br />intersections to determine if they need improvements such as turn lanes or an <br />upgrade in traffic control. <br />The existing and forecasted turning movement volumes along with the existing <br />intersection configurations and traffic control were used to develop the average <br />delay per intersection in each study scenario. The delay calculations were done in <br />accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 61" Edition using the Vistro software <br />package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service <br />(LOS) grades and queue lengths, are included in the Appendix. Also included in the <br />Appendix is a guide explaining the Level of Service grade concept. <br />Chart 2 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 3 (p.m. peak hour) show the average peak hour <br />delay per traffic signal -controlled intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E <br />boundary of 55 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between <br />acceptable and unacceptable traffic signal operation in Minnesota. <br />The initial signal timing for the existing conditions was provided by Anoka County. <br />Traffic Impact Study 9 .#;: <br />#) <br />Riverstone South Development <br />' S P.a,,c,, ',k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.