My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/09/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 03/09/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:54:15 PM
Creation date
3/9/2021 3:59:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/09/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #21-038 <br />RESOLUTION TO HIRE A PATROL OFFICER <br />WHEREAS, the 2021 budget included funding for a new Patrol Officer position; and <br />WHEREAS, a recruitment process was conducted; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew Barker has been selected by staff to fill the position; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew Barker successfully passed the City's pre -employment checks, <br />including: reference checks, background and driving record checks, pre -employment assessments, <br />and pre -employment physical and drug screen; and <br />WHEREAS, all Patrol Officers are subject to the Law Enforcement Labor Services union <br />contract, including a 1-year probation; and <br />WHEREAS, Staff recommends hiring Mr. Matthew Barker effective on or near April 1, <br />2021, at step 1 of the 2021 pay scale, which is $28.35 per hour. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1) Motion to adopt resolution #21-038 hiring Mr. Matthew Barker to the position of Patrol <br />Officer, effective on or near April 1, 2021 at $28.35 per hour, which is step 1 of the 2021 <br />wage scale. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following were absent: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.