Laserfiche WebLink
Recommendation: add bird -safe lighting standards and wildlife protections <br />The Mississippi River is a crucial migratory flyway for about 40% of all North American migrating <br />birds. Roughly 270 bird species live in or travel through the Twin Cities river flyway. Bird <br />populations are experiencing significant collapse and are under continued threat. In the U.S. it's <br />estimated that 600 million birds are killed in window strikes each year. Lighting, landscaping, and <br />building glass are all contributing factors. <br />One way to balance a developed environment with wildlife protection is to require bird -friendly <br />exterior lighting (namely, downward -shielded lighting) in the Critical Area. Minneapolis, which was <br />the first city to pass its MRCCA ordinance, added a "Performance Standards for Exterior Lighting" <br />section that is attached to this letter as a reference. Other cities are adding or considering similar <br />provisions in their pending ordinances. We recommend Ramsey do the same. <br />Another opportunity for stronger wildlife protections could be to add this as a required finding for <br />variance and CUP requests: "The variance will not negatively impact birds and other wildlife using <br />the Mississippi Flyway through habitat loss in identified PCAs and significant vegetation stands, <br />collision threats, or light pollution in excess of the required lighting standards of this zoning <br />ordinance." (This is also in Minneapolis' ordinance and is likely to be included in others.) <br />Recommendation: expand vegetation management standards <br />The MRCCA ordinance offers an opportunity to promote healthy plant communities along the <br />riverfront, as well. Ramsey could consider these additions to the Vegetation Management section of <br />the ordinance: <br />• 1.4: Consider adding "removal of healthy trees over four inches in circumference" to the list <br />of activities for which a permit is required. <br />• I.b.4.7: Consider expanding the requirement that "vegetation removal activities are <br />conducted so as to expose the smallest practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible <br />time" by adding "and to avoid bird migration and nesting seasons." <br />• I.6.b.2: We recommend that vegetation restoration plans must be prepared by "a qualified <br />individual -with demonstrable experience and knowledge related to management of natural <br />areas such as natural resource manager or ecologist." <br />FMR's staff ecologists recommend this wording to ensure that the plans are prepared by <br />someone with specific expertise in natural vegetation that not all lawn care professionals may <br />have. <br />Additional recommendations <br />We have a couple of additional recommendations for Ramsey's ordinance: <br />