My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:37:42 AM
Creation date
7/1/2005 2:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/07/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Z.B. June 10, 2005 -- Page 7 <br /> <br />lowed the ci/y to seek additional information as part of the application process. <br /> Based on these considerations, the city's request for an excluded-uses 1/st, <br />including medical waste, was based on the authority of the municipal code as <br />well as the evidence in the proceeding. Importantly, the city could restrict uses <br />that were dangerous to health, safety, or property in times of flooding. <br /> Nothing suggested the city approved the permit of a similarly situated <br />applicant. Ultimately, Roussell failed to show the city's denial was illegal, arbi- <br />trary, or unreasonable.' <br />see also: State ex rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 24 <br />S. W. 3d 68_1 (2000). <br />see also: Ford Leasing Development Co. v. Cio,'of Ellisville, 718 S. W. 2d 228 <br />(1986). <br /> <br />Variance --Applicant claims his job requires motorcycle garage <br />None of these arguments are in the record granting the variance <br />Citation: Doris Terry Revocable Living Trust wZoning B'oard of Adjustment of <br />the City of Pittsburgh, Commonwealth Court of Penns~'lvania, No. 829 C.D. <br />2004 (2005) -- <br /> <br />PENNSYLVANIA (04/28/05) -- Seate owned a lot of land adjoining a lot owned <br />by the Doris Terry Revocable Living Trust. The two lots were located in an <br />historic, residential district. <br /> Seate built a small one-story motorcycle garage in the rear yard of his <br />property. Since the garage was not within the required setbacks, Seate re- <br />quested a variance fr6m the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The board granted <br />the variance. <br /> The trust sued, and the court ruled in favor of the board. <br /> The trust appealed, arguing the record did not support the board's grant.of <br />the variance. <br />DECISION: Reversed. <br /> Seare was not entitled to a variance. <br /> The overriding standard for a variance was unnecessary hardship. Seate <br />did not define his hardship, economic or otherwise, and offered no evidence as <br />to why the particular placement of the garage was necessary to. avoid the <br />hardship. <br /> Seate argued other factors supported the finding of a hardship. Seate claimed <br />he was a nationally recognized expert Qn motorcycles whose work included a <br />regular column in the Pittsburgh Tribune, six books, and appearances on na- <br />tional.news programs such as the CBS Evening News. Seate said that he made <br />his living from writing about motorcycle riding, etiquette, and safety, and his <br />motorcycle was his only form of transportation. Finally, he argued the neigh- <br />borhood was dotted with garages large enough to house an automobile that <br /> <br />2005 Quinlan Publishing Group. Any reproduction is prohibited. For more inlormation please call (617) 542-0048. <br /> <br />99 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.