Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />That the applicant appeared before the Ramsey Planning Commission for a public hearing <br />pursuant to Section 9.03.05of the City Code on July 7, 2005 and that said public hearing was <br />properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a <br />part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />That the Applicant's approved plan consisted of exporting a total of approximately 200,000 <br />yards of earth material. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that the estimated completion date to export the remaining earth <br />material is August 31, 2005, and is therefore requesting a 90 (ninety) day permit. <br /> <br />That the City Engineer inspected the 'Subject. Property on July 1, 2005 and determined the <br />following: a) the perimeter of the excavation needs to be reshaped to a 4:1 slope; and b) the <br />Applicant is not in total :compliance with the phas_ing plan that requires all but a maximum of <br />5 acres of excavation area to be established with turf. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that the proposed haul route for incoming and outgoing trucks <br />will be from the site directly north for a distance of 1,200 feet to County Road #63. <br /> <br />That no fill materials, except topsoil for restoration, ~r~ propo~:.ed to be imported to the site. <br /> <br />That no blasting will be employed in the grading activity. <br /> <br />That the existing drainage patterns will not be substantially altered by the proposed grading <br />plan. <br /> <br />That the plan proposes to maintain silt fence along the perimeter of Wetland. <br /> <br />That the grading .operation will increase the traffic to and from the subject property for the <br />period of time the permit is in effect. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise, detrimental to persons <br />residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public Welfare. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br />value of surrounding property. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br />uses. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be a substan-tial improvement to prope~Xy in the immediate <br />vicinity and to the community as a whole. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be served adequately by public facilities and services such. as <br />highways and streets. <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION//05-07- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />