My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/16/2021 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/16/2021 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:59:35 AM
Creation date
3/25/2021 2:08:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/16/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fire Chief Kohner stated that the case provides a great explanation on the value of the duty officer. <br />He noted that this responsibility has been in place for ten years, but times have changed, and other <br />cities are paying, therefore it is important and the right thing to do to compensate those that are <br />waiting at home for the pager to go off. He stated that there is a big value to having an officer that <br />can respond from their home. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked if people volunteer to be the duty officer. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kohner replied that they are not volunteers but a group of officers that are designated <br />as duty on-call. He stated that there are seven officers that choose different weeks of availability <br />to be on-call. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she appreciates the restructuring that occurred for the duty <br />officer wages, which resulted in a savings for the City. She asked for more detail on the readiness <br />for the on-call position, specifically whether they are just waiting at home. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kohner stated that during the specific timeframe they have to be at home and ready to <br />respond to any calls, should the pager go off. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for input on the two options for pay. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kohner explained that these were examples from neighboring cities. He stated that <br />although the purpose of a duty officer is the same, the hours could be slightly different. He stated <br />that Ramsey would be paying two hours per day, which would equate to 14 hours per week whereas <br />Andover pays 24 hours in one week. He confirmed that officers would still receive compensation <br />when responding to a call. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced the comments that these funds would come from the 2021 <br />budget and asked for further details on how this could have been included in the budget. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher stated that the funding listed within the case is the amount <br />that would be required based on the current employee hourly wages and hours staffed. She stated <br />that this has been on the to do list for staff for multiple years and therefore believed that the dollars <br />were built into the budget in anticipation of this action and therefore this would not cause wages <br />to go over budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would want to know more about how this was budgeted <br />and the funding available. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated that the question would be whether duty officers are compensated for taking <br />time out of their lives to commit to an on-call shift. He stated that other cities are paying their duty <br />officers and therefore it would be fair to compensate these employees. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kohner stated that although the pay structure is different, this would mirror the on-call <br />public works staff compensation. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / February 16, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.