Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. VanScoy agreed and stated that is why he wanted to be clear that the residential development <br />would occur in an isolated area between the park and church that would not be against the existing <br />residential development. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that this could go forward on a Council worksession in <br />March to gain their input. <br />Mr. Bauer stated that he believed that Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent is bringing <br />the potential park expansion concept forward and asked if it would make sense to bring this <br />discussion forward at the same time. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that the park discussion will help to make this subject <br />clearer as the direction has changed on the needs for the park since the last time the Council <br />reviewed that topic. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that he believes that the topics could go forward <br />together in the same discussion as they are interwoven. He stated that staff can work with the <br />church to gain additional input before it goes to the Council. <br />3. OTHER <br />No additional comments. <br />4. ADJOURNMENT <br />The regular meeting of the Planning Commission adjourned at 7:54 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Chloe McGuire Brigl <br />Senior Planner <br />ATTEST: <br />JoAnn Shaw <br />Community Development Assistant <br />Drafted by Amanda Staple <br />Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. <br />Planning Commission/ February 11, 2021 <br />Page 10 of 10 <br />