Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Riley stated that he agrees with the recommendation of staff. He stated that he <br />has not heard that the City's approach is poor in that the City is doing too little or too much. He <br />stated that the only. comment he has heard is the process and length of the process in that one <br />specific case. He stated that if a problem has been identified and the property owner is aware of <br />the problem, the process should be quicker. <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed that this is a good start but stated that she would like to have <br />one more discussion on the topic. She stated that the one case that had been brought forward in <br />the past had a concern with the length of the process. She stated that the City has taken the <br />approach of primarily only addressing complaints and if prosecution is escalated too quickly in <br />some cases, the City should be mindful of the complaint -based approach. <br />Mayor LeTourneau 4greed that this is a good start, but further discussion will be needed. <br />3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br />3.01: Review Future Topics/ Calendar <br />Noted. <br />4. MAYOR / COUNCIL / STAFF INPUT <br />None. <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br />The Work Session of the City Council was adjourned at 6:59 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Kurtis G. Ulrich <br />City Administrator <br />ATTEST: <br />Katie M. Schmidt <br />Administrative Assistant <br />Drafted by Amanda Staple <br />Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. <br />City Council Work Session / November 27, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />