Laserfiche WebLink
O <br />Lt1CMINNESOTA <br />CITIES � <br />March 9, 2021 <br />COALITION OF <br />[REFER MN CITIE <br />METRO <br />CITIES <br />Association of Metropolitan Municipalities <br />MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE <br />CO (MISSION <br />Re: City concerns with SF 915 (zoning preemption) <br />Dear Members of the Senate Housing Finance Policy Committee: <br />The League of Minnesota Cities, Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, Minnesota Association of Small <br />Cities, Metro Cities, and Municipal Legislative Commission respectfully ask members oppose efforts to <br />preempt city zoning authority as called for in SF 915. Mandating one -size -fits -all policies on all 853 <br />cities removes the ability for cities to respond to locally -identified priorities. <br />SF 915 preempts local zoning authority by limiting planned unit development (PUD) conditions, <br />prohibiting aesthetic conditions, mandating allowance of temporary family health care dwellings, <br />requiring a 60-day rule for building permits, etc. Cities know their communities and are in the best <br />position to address local zoning and respond to local needs — not the state legislature. This one -size -fits - <br />all bill attacks the fundamental importance of local control, and universally mandated zoning <br />requirements would eliminate the uniqueness of our communities. <br />It has been alleged that city regulations and fees are some of the driving factors in housing costs. But it <br />is generally acknowledged that land, labor, and materials are the highest cost drivers — not city <br />regulations or fees. City fees only represent 3-7% of the cost of home. <br />Home prices are market driven. In the face of challenging market forces, cities continue to innovate <br />through policy and provide direct assistance to developers and homebuyers despite limited resources. <br />However, even if cities eliminated the regulations and fees that ensure the health, safety, and welfare of <br />residents, anything a builder may save carries with it no guarantee that a home would be sold for less <br />and would likely end up as more profit for the builder. <br />Finally, city zoning does not appear to be an obstacle for builders, as illustrated by recent record -high, <br />single-family home construction. Latest numbers show a 32% February increase. Cities are committed <br />to promoting development at all levels of the housing continuum. But broad preemption of local zoning <br />authority under the guise of housing affordability is not the answer to market challenges we face in parts <br />of the state. <br />Please join us in preserving city authority to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of our residents and <br />oppose the preemption found in these bills. <br />Sincerely, <br />Irene Kao Bradley Peterson <br />League of Minnesota Cities Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities <br />Cap O'Rourke <br />Minnesota Association of Small Cities <br />Tom Poul <br />Municipal Legislative Commission <br />Patricia Nauman <br />Metro Cities <br />