My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:08:24 AM
Creation date
4/14/2021 10:44:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/08/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the COR framework states that the front of the building should be at Sunwood, but it does not <br />appear that is the front. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that similar to the other properties along Sunwood, the <br />façade along Sunwood is more of a faux façade with parking and the main entrance along the <br />auxiliary street. She stated that has become the common practice as long as the design standards <br />can be met for the Sunwood facing side. She commented that it would be consistent with the <br />surrounding uses. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that there was a similar discussion with the daycare center, to have the <br />Sunwood side not have the appearance of the back of the building, while allowing the entrance off <br />the other side of the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that the other businesses still have an entrance on the <br />Sunwood side whereas this would not have that entrance. He stated that this is a corner lot and <br />therefore in the framework it states that it should be situated in the corner of the lot. He was unsure <br />that this building would fit within that build to zone. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that there are two doors on the north elevation which would face <br />Sunwood. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that one of the doors is for the staff patio and the other <br />would be an exit door. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that there will be parking along Zeolite and confirmed that bushes <br />and trees would be used for screening. He commented that there would be some potential issues <br />with equipment screening but believed that was covered within the project documents. He asked <br />for details on the structure shown in the northeast corner. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that is the fenced in area. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that it appears in the floorplan there would be a hot tub in <br />that area. He was unsure that wood fencing would be allowed. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that staff discussed whether alternate materials would <br />be more appropriate for the fencing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked where the wellhead is located relative to the property. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl identified the well, which is on the adjacent property that will <br />remain an outlot. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Curt Strandland, Classic Construction, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He referenced the doors <br />on the north elevation noting that one door would exit to the patio. He stated that they would be <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ March 4, 2021 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.