My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:08:24 AM
Creation date
4/14/2021 10:44:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/08/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Bakritges, Capstone Homes, commented that he provided a more comprehensive presentation <br />to the City Council and Public Works Committee. He stated that the Pearson family has been at <br />the homestead property for 75 years and therefore they would like to honor the family with one of <br />the street names. He noted that Pearson Place and Pearson Park have already been named after <br />the family on other property they owned that has been developed. He commented that unicorn is <br />not a good name in terms of marketing homes and Capstone does not feel that would be a good fit <br />for the neighborhood. He asked that the Commission approve of the request. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that there is already a Unicorn Street in Ramsey and it is part <br />of the County grid. He asked why it is a bad name in the opinion of Capstone. <br /> <br />Mr. Bakritges commented that a unicorn is a mythical figure and not a real animal, therefore it <br />does not technically fit within the grid. He stated that some people do not like those types of names <br />for their street, noting that the City approved a change from Sloth Street to Snowy Owl Street in <br />Riverstone North. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that he lives in Riverstone North on Quintana and asked what type of <br />animal that is. <br /> <br />Mr. Bakritges stated that he is not sure of how that name came to be. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that Quintana is not an animal and came about in <br />a similar discussion on the street name. He stated that the Public Works Committee did make this <br />recommendation for the compromise on street naming. <br /> <br />Police Chief Katers commented that public safety and public works provided input at the Public <br />Works Committee noting that police and fire oppose changes to the street name grid as it follows <br />the County grid. He noted that the County grid ensures that public safety can easily respond to <br />calls for service within their own community and in situations of mutual aid as all the communities <br />follow the County grid. He stated that there are 18 addresses on the north end of Ramsey that are <br />on Unicorn Street already. He noted that public safety wants to remain with the logical naming <br />system and therefore oppose deviation from the naming system. He commented that in times of <br />emergency when GPS service is not available, public safety would be able to respond within their <br />own community and neighboring communities based on the County grid system. He stated that <br />public safety also opposed the changes requested by the applicant for Riverstone North in 2017, <br />which were ultimately approved by the City. He asked that the Commission follow the grid system <br />for street names. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy referenced the comment from Police Chief Katers that public works <br />opposes the change, but the case stated that the Public Works Committee supports the change and <br />asked for clarification. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that the Public Works Committee is composed of <br />three City Council members. He noted that meeting of the Public Works Committee was the <br />same night as a special City Council workshop meeting, therefore all six members of the Council <br />as well as the Councilmember Elect were present and there were no comments of opposition. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ March 4, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.