Laserfiche WebLink
1 other things, he has in his opinion a very good analysis of the <br />2 safety aspect of this case, and it is printed in the joint <br />appendix. And if it has not been read by any member of the <br />4 Court, I would urge its being read, because I think that it is <br />5 <br />very helpful to understand the case. <br />QUESTION: We have no record as to the conduct of the <br />7 pickets; there was picketing, was there not? <br />MR. FUHRMAN: There was picketing. And there is a <br />record of its conduct. The picketing occurred, however, prior <br />10 to the adoption of the ordinance. And the reason why that <br />record exists is because the picketers had to show their <br />12 standing to bring the action. And they, of course, had been <br />L3 picketing right up until the time that the legislation was <br />14 adopted. So when the legislation was adopted, they then <br />15 commenced their action and applied for the preliminary <br />16 injunction. <br />17 QUESTION: And what was their conduct? <br />18 MR. FUHRMAN: Well, there were pickets of eleven to <br />19 forty people picketing off and on over a period of <br />20 approximately three weeks. Their conduct was to denounce the <br />21 Doctor. <br />2 <br />QUESTION: How, vocally or signs? <br />23 MR. FUHRMAN: Both, both vocally and by sign. He was <br />24 described as a baby killer, and there were other picturesque <br />25 phrases that are in the record. <br />11 <br />Heritage Reporting Corporation <br />(202) 628-4888 <br />