Laserfiche WebLink
unaware the item was going to be discussed. He commented that this resolution was passed as not <br />wasting staff resources enforcing the mask mandate but the other side that needs to be <br />communicated in that the exact opposite has happened. He commented that an immense number <br />of resources have been spent on the resolution that was passed in how the City has had to react to <br />it, how staff has had to deal with the messaging, and it has created confusion and misinformation <br />in the community. He commented that businesses in the community are suffering because of the <br />misinformation and confusion. He noted that the past 90 minutes have been spent discussing this <br />point and none of the City business has come before the Council. He asked what resources the <br />Council believed were being wasted when a tiny percentage of police calls were related to the <br />mask mandate but since then by far more resources have been wasted with the passing of the <br />resolution. He added that the science of COVID is clear and COVID is real. He commented that <br />masks were not recommended in the beginning because they needed them for healthcare workers <br />and did not want them hoarded in the way toilet paper was hoarded. He commented that science <br />evolves over time and the current science is clear in that the CDC and WHO recommend that <br />masks prevent the spread of COVID. He stated that over 500,000 people have died of COVID in <br />this country and masks are still being made a political issue. He strongly encouraged the Council <br />to rescind the resolution it passed. <br />Councilmember Heineman referenced the gentleman from Minnetonka commenting that it takes <br />bravery to show up to a city you are not a part of. He commented that his opinion was not shared <br />by the majority of people present and commended him for still coming forward to speak. He stated <br />that the stains of the nation's history are everyone's to share and the lessons of history are <br />everyone's to share and not reserved for those directly affected. He stated that if the magnitude of <br />this Executive Order fails to meet the comparison of Roosevelt's Executive Order, the similarities <br />can still be called out. He referenced the comment that the Council is wasting time and responded <br />that giving residents a voice is not wasting time. He referenced the comment that the resolution <br />was about the right to breath and commented that mischaracterizing the resolution does not make <br />it fact. He commented that the resolution states clearly that it is about executive overreach. He <br />referenced the comment that a resident wished they brought a cheering section. He commented <br />that this is not a cheering section but residents with equal voices and everyone's comments are <br />important. He referenced the comment that personal passions should not get in the way of the duty <br />of the Council and noted that preservation of the constitution is not a personal passion but part of <br />the oath he took at a Councilmember and as a member of the military. <br />Mayor Kuzma commented that as he previously stated he intended to reverse the resolution and <br />was extremely disappointed that the Council was unwilling to do so, despite growing concerns <br />from businesses and residents and a strong statement from the Attorney General's Office stating <br />that the Executive Order takes precedent over the measures passed by any lower unit of <br />government. He stated that it is tough for the Council to ask residents to obey laws when the <br />Council does not follow them. He stated that the Councilmembers in the minority worked <br />tirelessly to address the concern to get back into compliance with the law but unfortunately there <br />was little interest in reversing the decision which placed the City in a very difficult predicament <br />and has opened the City up to legal liability. He hoped the Council understands the gravity of the <br />situation. He stated that tonight the Council was put on notice of the potential for legal action that <br />has been turned over to the City Attorney. <br />City Council / March 23, 2021 <br />Page 11 of 24 <br />