Agenda - Council - 04/13/2021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

J ti) cn 4.1 V �O L a 0 .4) ff is— V Created by Joe Feriancek Joe Feriancek Joe Feriancek Joe Feriancek Len Linton Len Linton Len Linton Markup Date 07/29/2020 07/29/2020 07/29/2020 07/29/2020 07/29/2020 07/29/2020 O N O N 01 N N O Markup Text My understanding is this connection was going to be a road connection rather than a trail. A road connection would make the most sense in my opinion. The stub location does not appear to leave much buildable area on the north side of the road if the next parcel develops before the Solar Farm site developes. To give more comment to Tim's comment, it is not desirable for the City to have trunk utiliies, or any sanitary or water utilities in green space due to access/maintenance concerns. Do you have a plan with proposed house types, or not that far along yet? Are the townhomes planned to be slab on grade, spacing wise they appear close together to have a walkout type design. The project to the south showed stormwater overflow from their pond onto this site. The overflow route for this site must be called out on the preliminary plat. This muist be a full cul-de-sac, loosing the lots on either side of the stub until the next phase develops. The proximity of this stub to the south line of the solar farm limits future development until the solar farm is closed and the land redeveloped. Trunk Sanitary Sewer will require deducation of adequate drainage and utility easements. Layout may need to be changed to provide the necessary easements. A forcemain from the lift station will also be required which will require additional easement width. Markup Name L.L -I-I-I1-11-11-11-1-I-IJ File Name Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf Riverstone South Sketch Plan.pdf