My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/12/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 07/12/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
7/11/2005 7:18:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/12/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foot Traffic Access to County 5 and lteyond - There was earlier discussion on how residents of this new <br />development would access to County 5 in the future. A previous proposal at a Planning and Zoning <br />Committee meeting showed a boardwalk over a narrows in the wetland that would connect to the trails <br />along County 5. This has been eliminated on the most current site plan. Without this path, residents would <br />either back around on Radium and 157® Lane (unlikely), or would cut across my property which is on the <br />northern end of the wetland. I need assurance that I will not have a foot path across my property. <br /> <br />Rezone of property from R-1 Single Family to Planned Unit Development- At the last City Council <br />Meeting, the agenda listed preliminary site plan approval before request to rezone property. Why wouldn't <br />the issue ofrezoning to PUD occur prior to site plan approval. To me, it would appear that if you approve <br />the preliminary site plan calling for a PUD, you would be committed to approving the rezoning to PUD. I <br />see the rezoning issue to be much more important than the details of the site plan approval, and the <br />rezoning should occur first, not the site plan. <br /> <br />Definition of "Detached Townhouse" does not exist in Ramsey - This must be resolved before <br />preliminary site plan approval. Multiple.unit townhouse development would be totally unacceptable, and <br />R1 Single Family should have lot sizes that fit the definition, 'not 30% of the P,.-1 Standard. <br /> <br />All of these issues must be resolved first. The Planning and Zoning Committee has repeatedly directed this <br />developer to resolve the density issue on 157th Avenue, and there have been no adjustments made in this <br />area of the site plan. Until the density has been reduced, proper transitioning'to the existing residences <br />addressed to a reasonable level, ali city ordinances and zoning is met, and traffic and access issues are <br />resolved, the City coungil cannot possibly approve this preliminary site plan. <br /> <br />Thank-you for your time and consideration, <br /> <br />Terrance Petro <br /> <br />-154- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.