Laserfiche WebLink
City to negotiate with these propertY owners without having done anything to minimize the <br />concern regarding the roadway. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Olson, and Pearson. <br />Voting No: Councilmembers Elvig, Jeffrey, and Strommen. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Jeffrey stated he has trouble with condemning someone's <br />property if there have not been any good faith negotiations at this point. <br /> <br />Case #6: Request to Rezone Property from R-1 Residential to Planned <br /> Unit Development; Case of Shade <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon <br />rezoning to Planned Unit Development <br />Boulevard, west of Potassium Street, and <br />detacl~ed townhomes and Setback Variances in the <br /> <br />~lied for a <br /> Nowthen <br /> for the <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded b <br />ordinance amending Section 9.20.04 <br />Minnesota. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember <br />and 10 were to be removed from the <br />a PUD would still be necessary <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: (~:~i~ Gamec: <br />Olson, and Strommen. <br /> <br />:arson, to introduce an <br /> Code of Ramsey, <br /> <br />still be required if units 8, 9 <br /> Director Trudgeon replied <br /> <br />ers Cook, Pearson, Elvig, Jeffrey, <br /> <br />Case #7: Request Plat and Site Plan Apprwval of Rum River Estates; <br /> <br />Communi~y'i!De~ei~?~i!D.~ect°r indi~ated National Growth has applied for <br />preliminary plat and sit'e:"Pi~i:.~iew to a residential Planned unit Development (PUD) <br />subdivision on the prope~i:i d north of Potassium Street and south of 157t" Lane. The <br />Preliminary plat is propo.sing:"~iii~a access from Potassium Street. <br />couhcflme~!ber <br /> Strommen s~i ~ide from the Potassium Street issue, her major concern is the <br />length of ~heeuI~de,sac shO~!~J~he site plan <br />Councilmember :6i~':~i~ed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated this is a challenging piece of property without any access to the · <br />south. He suggested if this project is approved the City should look at first right of refusal on the <br />properties directly north of the cul-de-sac to provide access. This may be able to be done in <br />phases with the City being proactive. <br /> <br />City Council / june 14, 2005 <br /> Page 13 of 29 <br /> <br />-,157- <br /> <br /> <br />