Laserfiche WebLink
CC Special Work Session <br />Meeting Date: 04/20/2021 <br />Title: <br />Review Water Treatment Plant Schedule and Construction Method <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to discuss to possible construction methods for the construction of the proposed 10 <br />million gallon per day (MGD) water treatment plant. <br />Based upon research with other communities, it is common to employ a design -bid -build model for the construction <br />of water treatment plants. In this process, a multi -disciplinary consulting engineering firm employing a team of <br />architects, water process engineers, structural engineers, surveyors, and construction inspectors is hired to design <br />the WTP, after which the City bids the project with assistance from the consulting engineer, and the consulting <br />engineer oversees construction of the WTP. The benefit to this approach is that the same team is used to design the <br />WTP and to stake and oversee construction of the WTP. Plans and specifications can be developed quickly with a <br />multi -disciplinary consulting engineering firm, minimizing chances for for errors since all disciplines are employed <br />by the same firm, and fewer glitches should be expected during construction since the surveyors and inspectors are <br />familiar with the plans and specifications and are able to contact the proper personnel quickly as questions surface <br />during construction. <br />The other alternative construction process commonly used in municipal construction is the Construction Manager <br />Advisor model. This model is currently being used for the construction of the new PW facility. Under this model the <br />city hires an independent construction management firm that works closely with city staff and the architect to <br />design and manage the construction project. They work with staff to set the preliminary project budget, manage the <br />bidding process, construction schedule, review architectural plans and in our case helped interview architectural <br />firms. They also track the budget through out the project to help keep it in line and assist with value engineering if <br />needed. <br />Timeframe: <br />20 Minutes <br />Funding Source: <br />Water Fund 9601 and Sewer Fund 9602 <br />Responsible Party(ies): <br />John Nelson, Grant Riemer and Staff <br />Outcome: <br />Due to the complexity of a water treatment plant, staff would recommend using the design -bid -build model. Where <br />as the PW facility is primarily a vehicle storage and maintenance facility, the water treatment plant houses several <br />multi part processes responsible for providing safe, clean, drinking water for our community. <br />Schedule <br />Once the construction management method is decided on, the tentative schedule would be: <br />Prepare RFP in house, PWC review, CC approval — 7 weeks <br />Submit RFP's, wait for proposals —5 weeks <br />Review proposals in house, select top 3 firms — 2 weeks <br />