My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/20/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2021
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/20/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:32:50 AM
Creation date
4/20/2021 9:19:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/20/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Works Committee 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 04/20/2021 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Title: <br />Consider Request to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement at 15730 Armstrong Boulevard <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City received an application from Eduard Kopaygorodskiy (the "Applicant") to vacate an existing drainage and <br />utility easement (the "Easement") that bisects the property at 15730 Armstrong Boulevard NW (the "Subject <br />Property"). The Applicant had proposed to dedicate right-of-way for a cul-de-sac bulb that would improve upon the <br />existing size of the Eland Street cul-de-sac, which currently fits entirely within the sixty-six (66) foot wide <br />right-of-way. However, what was initially proposed by the Applicant was not contained entirely on the Subject <br />Property (portions of the proposed right-of-way impacted the two adjacent properties to the north) and did not meet <br />the minimum right-of-way radius requirement of sixty-five (65) feet. <br />The purpose of this case is to get direction from the Public Works Committee as to whether the full right-of-way <br />radius, on the Subject Property, should be required, or if some reduced size would be acceptable, if it improved on <br />the current situation. <br />Timeframe: <br />15 minutes <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Subject Property was created as part of the Nordvik Addition in 2001. The Plat was a lot split, with an existing <br />home on the southern lot and the Subject Property as the new, buildable lot. While the lot met the lot width standard <br />in place at that time (200 feet), it was along Armstrong Boulevard rather than Eland Street. The Development <br />Agreement stated that access was to be from Armstrong Boulevard, where the lot width complied with City Code, <br />but that a sixty-six (66) foot wide Drainage and Utility Easement would reserve a corridor for a future southern <br />extension of Eland Street should the land be further subdivided in the future. At that time, access to the Subject <br />Property (and the lot to the south) would be converted to Eland Street and eliminated from Armstrong Boulevard. <br />The Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) and is also guided as Rural Developing in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. It seems unlikely the Subject Property would be further subdivided any time in the near future <br />as that would require a Zoning Amendment, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and extension of both sewer and <br />water trunk lines (water is relatively close, at 157th Avenue and Armstrong Boulevard; but sanitary sewer is much <br />further away, Variolite Street to the east and 150th Lane to the south). <br />The Applicant intends to construct a new home on the Subject Property and has stated their preference is to <br />eliminate the access to Armstrong Boulevard and construct a new driveway from the existing Eland Street <br />cul-de-sac. The Applicant has stated that they have no desire to subdivide the Subject Property further and <br />connecting to the local street would create a safer access than onto a County Highway. Furthermore, the Applicant <br />is agreeable to deeding the right of access along Armstrong Boulevard to the public, eliminating any potential for a <br />future driveway onto the County Highway. <br />The Applicant has expressed concern with accommodating the full right-of-way for a cul-de-sac on the Subject <br />Property. City Code requires a radius of sixty-five (65) feet for a rural section cul-de-sac. Their initial proposal <br />included a fifty-five (55) foot wide radius, but portions of the proposed right-of-way spilled over onto the two <br />adjacent parcels to the north. Note that the actual enlarged cul-de-sac bulb would not be constructed at this time; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.