Laserfiche WebLink
Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that this area is identified for retail development and at <br /> some point, this type of use would end on the site. <br /> Mr. Lee stated that he purchased the property for future development. He stated that they found it <br /> easy to find a tenant to use the site until development reaches this site. He agreed that the future <br /> use of this site would be retail but stated that it would be hard to anticipate when that will occur. <br /> He stated that this action would help them to maintain the site until the development reaches this <br /> site. <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff asked if there is screening between this site and the adjacent retail <br /> development. <br /> Mr. Lee confirmed that the retail development planted a line of trees to provide screening. <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked and received confirmation that the time period for this interim use <br /> permit would be five years. He asked if the containers could be moved back to be behind the <br /> building and look better on the site rather than the haphazard placement that currently exists. <br /> Mr. Lee confirmed that could be considered. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl displayed an aerial photograph of the site, identifying the location <br /> of the containers and the area Commission Anderson would desire. <br /> Councilmember Gengler asked if there is a specific area that would hope to be covered with the <br /> class five gravel. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl identified the area where gravel would be placed. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the location of the containers proposed by Commissioner <br /> Anderson on the side of the building would be functional for the use. <br /> Mr. Lee commented that it would be hard for him to answer that question as he is not the end user <br /> and is the property owner. He did not believe there would be an issue as the containers are front <br /> loaded. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy commented that two of the containers abut the eastern fence and asked if <br /> there would be a setback or screening added. <br /> Mr. Lee replied that the fence is setback 10 feet from the property line, and they did not have any <br /> intent on adding screening as the neighboring property owner planted trees. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy commented that when he visited the property,he did not notice screening <br /> in the area where the containers back to the fence. He commented that the trees on the neighboring <br /> property are on the north end, whereas he is speaking about the containers on the south end of the <br /> property. <br /> Planning Commission/December 3,2020 <br /> Page 7 of 15 <br />