Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Musgrove and Woestehoff. <br />Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley referenced other existing courts in different locations. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood provided an update on the condition <br />of other courts. He noted that perhaps staff could put signage up asking for input on whether <br />residents would like the courts to continued to be used for tennis or considered for pickleball and/or <br />basketball. <br /> <br />5.02: Consider Recommending City Council Approval of Plans and Specifications and <br />Authorization for Bids for Business Park 95 Street Reconstructions, Improvement <br />Project #21-03 <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and recommended approval of plans and <br />specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for Improvement Project #21-03, Business <br />Park 95 Street Reconstruction. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked if it would make sense to speak with Anoka related to the cul-de-sac area <br />and creating a connection. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby replied that the City has had discussions on that idea, but it has been met <br />with opposition on the Anoka side. He noted that the cul-de-sac would allow for future connection <br />if that possibility came forward in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove noted that it would seem beneficial to both cities. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that Anoka County may be willing to facilitate <br />the discussion as it would also create a benefit to the Highway 10 corridor. He noted that perhaps <br />a joint meeting with both Councils would be helpful as well. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley stated that he agrees other funds should be used for the cul-de-sac and agreed <br />PIR would seem appropriate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff agreed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if there would be a negative to using the PIR fund. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby replied that staff does not see a negative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if this would impact the Bunker Lake Boulevard project. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby replied that there should not be an overlap between the projects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that this project has been discussed for some time and is <br />needed. She asked for additional details on the alternates mentioned. <br />Public Works Committee / March 16, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />