Laserfiche WebLink
QUESTION: And that means that you have to be <br />2 concentrating on one dwelling? <br />MR. FUHRMAN: That is right. <br />4 QUESTION: If you were just walking through the <br />5 neighborhood, that would not qualify? <br />MR. FUHRMAN: That would not qualify. <br />7 QUESTION: Suppose you were walking by a home with a <br />P picket sign that said, -I am against the war in the Asian <br />Gulf", would that be a violation of the statute? <br />10 MR. FUHRMAN: In the Town of Brookfield, under this <br />11 ordinance, it would be. <br />12 QUESTION: And what would that damage be to the city? <br />13 MR. FUHRMAN: The damage would be to privacy. <br />14 Because the ordinance is content neutral. It has nothing to do <br />15 with the message at all. <br />16 QUESTION: So if you had some people marching up and <br />;7 down these streets saying vote for so and so for sheriff, that <br />18 would be banned, too? <br />19 MR. FUHRMAN: If as Justice Scalia asked, it was a <br />20 march, the answer would be that it would not be in violation of <br />21 the ordinance. However, if the pickets actually pursued a <br />22 route only in front of this particular house, any particular <br />23 house which is targeted, then it would be a violation. <br />24 QUESTION Do the findings of fact indicate that <br />25 there is a commercial area or business area in which picketing <br />9 <br />Heritage Reporting Corporation <br />(202) 628-4886 <br />