Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021

Home

Commissioner Anderson commented that once again this would create the dilemma of issuing a variance for things outside of the City Code. He stated that this is the same issue as Bowers Drive. He noted that longer cul-de-sacs create a safety concern as noted by Public Works and Public Safety. He asked the liability the City would have if there were an emergency and access cannot be gained. He stated that perhaps it would be time to review the maximum cul-de-sac length and determine if an adjustment should be made to City Code. He stated that he would love to see this development go through but could not support something that would put the City or the residents at risk. He stated that he would like input from Public Safety and Public Works on the appropriate length of a cul-de-sac. Commissioner Gengler commented that she supports the proposal. She realizes that it may not be ideal but given the unique circumstances of the property and adjustments that have been made to the road width, she can support the application. th Commissioner VanScoy commented that he appreciates the comments from the residents on 178 and likes that the developer is proposing fewer lots. He stated that he does have concern with the lack of a second access, as that is critical for long term development, noting that this would landlock 40 acres. He commented that making the property nice for a few individuals is not the best for the City. He stated that this is the first time that he has seen a sketch plan where the Council has developed a resolution to influence the mission. Commissioner Dunaway commented that in reviewing the site plan and sketch plan he was unable to see another potential access for the site. He stated that he was unsure the Commission could require an applicant to purchase another property. He echoed the comments of Commissioner Walker that there are a lesser number of smaller lots, as that mitigates the impact on Public Safety. Commissioner Walker asked if it would make a difference if the developer widens the road even a bit further. He commented that there are several fire hydrants on Variolite that could be utilized by a pumper truck. He asked if a 40-foot-wide road would satisfy the concerns with the cul-de- sac length. He stated that he supports the application as presented but is trying to find a compromise for those that struggle. Commissioner Anderson commented that he likes that idea. He stated that he would even support wider than that road, or perhaps a divided roadway. Commissioner Peters commented that he would support a larger cul-de-sac at the end which would allow for trucks to turnaround. He commented that a divided road would require residents to only travel in one direction from their driveway in order to get around the development. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the Fire Department recommended a 32-foot roadway. She was unsure of the plowing concerns that would come with a 40-foot road. Chairperson Bauer commented that this is a unique situation in which the property is landlocked by existing development. He recognized that there have been compromises already reducing this proposal to nine lots. He encouraged the applicant to continue to work with City staff and Public Planning Commission/ April 8, 2021 Page 14 of 18