My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:47:07 AM
Creation date
5/12/2021 10:48:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/08/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the staff report stating that City staff recommends <br />approval of a Conditional Use Permit to the Preserve at Northfork to exceed signage standards for <br />an area identification sign on the subject property. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that he was surprised to see that the actual monument <br />structure is included in the size of the signage. He did not recall seeing that included in the <br />calculation in the past. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that she was unsure if a similar situation has been <br />reviewed in the past, but this was the method staff was directed to use to calculate the size. She <br />stated that this is unique in that the sign and monument portions are very separate where typically <br />there is not that separation. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that he was thinking that the monument structure acted similar to <br />a signpost and was also confused as to why that was included in the calculation. He stated that he <br />likes the appearance of this type of sign and would encourage more of this style of sign and <br />therefore commented that perhaps the regulation should be reviewed in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that he agrees that the sign calculation should be reviewed <br />in the future to determine what may or may not be considered as a signpost. He commented that <br />he does like the appearance of this sign. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />No comments. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Dunaway, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br /> <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner Walker aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Dunaway aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ April 8, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.