My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/11/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/11/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:58:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2021 10:26:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/11/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session <br />Meeting Date: 05/11/2021 <br />By: Brian McCann, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Discuss Potential Ordinance to Clarify Rooster Restrictions <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is two -fold. <br />1. Recommend a reformatting of Chapter 10 for consistent approach <br />2. Seek Policy Direction on Rooster Regulations <br />Reformatting <br />2.3. <br />Historically, the City's Animal Code focused on a delineation between lots smaller than 3 acres and lots that are <br />larger than 3 acres. The code is structured as such that many animals commonly considered as non -domestic <br />(chickens, pigs, cows, horses, etc.) required at least 3 acres. Since the time the Code was originally drafted, the City <br />has grown considerably. Additionally, the City has routinely tweaked the Animal Code on several occasions, <br />providing a bit of a patchwork and a Code that is difficult to interpret. <br />The simple solution is to redraft the ordinance so that the process and definitions are consistent regardless of <br />whether the property less smaller than 3 acres or larger than 3 acres. Staff will elaborate more at the Work Session. <br />Policy Question - is 3 acres still the correct break-point for 'farm -type' animals, or should that delineation be <br />changed to something different (E.g., 1 acre or 2 acre minimum). Regardless, an owner on less than 3 acres still has <br />the option to request approval from the City Council. <br />Roosters <br />Throughout 2020, the City received an increase in the number of complaints of roosters, especially on properties 1 <br />to 2 acres in size. Property Owners that own Roosters and were subjects of the complaints have been asking the <br />City to consider amending regulations to allow Roosters on properties at least 1 acre in size, understanding that <br />Roosters are probably not appropriate on smaller lots due to the nuisance created by noise. <br />Policy Question - does the City Council want to consider allowing Roosters on properties that are at least 1 acre in <br />size? <br />• Alternatives <br />• Not allowed on any lot regardless of size <br />• Require a property that is at least 2 acres <br />• Require a property that is at least 3 acres <br />City Staff is requesting an ordinance to clarify rooster restrictions in the City. Since 2010, there have been <br />approximately 30 code enforcement cases for violations of Chapter 10 - Animals, in regards to prohibited animals <br />on parcels three (3) acres or less. Many of these violations are for properties that have roosters. <br />Section 10.1 of City Code currently states: <br />"a. Animals on less than three acres. None of the following animals shall be maintained on any parcel of land in <br />the city that is not at least 3.0 acres (130,680 square feet) in size: llamas, cows, mules, donkeys, burros, goats, pigs, <br />sheep, lambs, turkey, geese and ducks. EXCEPTION: Chickens (hens only, no roosters or crowing hens) may be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.