My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/20/2021 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/20/2021 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:02:07 AM
Creation date
5/17/2021 8:39:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
04/20/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented that she likes the idea of having a primary if there are other <br />elections going on. She was unsure that a primary would be needed for a special election for a <br />vacant position. <br /> <br />City Attorney Langel agreed that it causes additional problems to have primaries for special <br />elections because of the timing and specific dates allowed for special elections. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked if eliminating primaries for special elections would allow for <br />someone to be elected as soon as possible. <br /> <br />City Attorney Langel confirmed that would allow the position to be filled more quickly as it would <br />eliminate that additional primary process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman stated that he would support eliminating primaries outside of a regular <br />general election. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked if there could then be three to five or more candidates for a special <br />election. <br /> <br />City Attorney Langel confirmed that a special election could have any number of candidates if <br />there is not a primary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell commented that she would perhaps favor a primary. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated that he was opposed to this in 2019 and remains opposed. He believed that <br />a primary serves a purpose in finding out additional information on candidates. He stated that if <br />there are five or more candidates it would be difficult to have useful information to base a decision <br />off. He stated that he would favor continuing with the existing process. <br /> <br />City Attorney Langel advised that if there is not support for the changes related to primaries, the <br />Council could choose to update the Charter to at minimum match the State Statute languages where <br />it is outdated and conflicting. He provided details on another option the City could pursue to fill <br />vacancies. He stated that State Statute would allow for the Council to appoint someone to a vacant <br />seat when there is less than two years on a term. He noted that the Charter Commission reviewed <br />that option and suggested that appointments be allowed when there is less than one year on a vacant <br />seat term. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that the City has had a problem for a number of years which <br />has resulted in an open seat almost consistently for the past five years because of the City rules for <br />special elections. He believed that primaries are not necessary as there are other government <br />positions that have multiple candidates to vote for. He stated that when he vacated his seat, he <br />aligned that with the seat vacation falling under a regular cycle. He asked if the language could <br />be written in a manner that would eliminate special elections, allow appointment, and instead have <br />an election on the next State held election day. <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / April 20, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.