Laserfiche WebLink
Adrly nistrator LflricI reviewed the 1.:?rocess for considering resoltrtions arid noted that typically <br />staff uses discretion but agreed :pefhaps there should be additional discussion on that pro -ess by <br />the Council. <br />Councilnieniber Howell stated that it .was her understanding that the (11„ouncii, has the option, to add <br />ordina",:rces if seconded by another CouticilmenTher. She assumed the discussion 'was related to the <br />request by herself and Councilmernber fleineman to add resolutions to .the agettja. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that his comments were related., to resolutions brought forward by <br />other groups using the eamples of Mack „History, Month or 'Daughters of. the .American <br />Revoluti011„. <br />-„.12nta agreed it "worti.d be helpful forthe Council to flaw a discussion on tLe poiicy., <br />Councilmember 1 eineman agreed that while it is good practice to have as m„uch time fir review <br />as possible the Chatter also gives the Council the ability' .to amend the agenda at any time. Fie <br />stated that while it would be a best practice, the Charter allows 'for amendment of the agenda at <br />any point. <br />Councilmember "Howell stated that if the Council does 'not like the rocess it should look to amend <br />the Charter. She stated that she wo-ld .prefer for 'iiirroclarnatio", .s to come through "worksessian <br />before appearing on the regular agenda. She 'believedthat the flex„ibility should remain for <br />Councilmembers to amend the agenda. <br />City Administrator 11„...)1rich Aed that he - t o a, future w-)rkse,',,„-,' 1.1!,ien„da for <br />discussion_ <br />5.„ADAIURNMENT <br />The Work Session of the (:.ity Councii was a djo iLrned at 6:57 <br />R„especi liLy subntittc <br />.iftis („J.. LJir ich <br />City Administrator <br />A I -I IST- <br />Deputy City ii(,:'lerk <br />Drafted by. Amanda Staple <br />Time,„S'ilver H?cretariaf,In.:!. <br />(it )rk Session /,,Ntar „.11, 2021 <br />Page 9 of 9 <br />