My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:58:39 PM
Creation date
5/25/2021 11:34:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/11/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 5. 10. <br />Meeting Date: 11/24/2020 <br />By: Chloe McGuire Brigl, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #20-256 Approving the Conditional Use Permit for Floodplain Fill at 7349 168th Cir NW.; Case <br />of John and JoDell Seaman <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a request from John and JoDell Seaman (the "Homeowners") for a <br />Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to fill within a floodplain at 7349 168th Cir NW (the "Subject Property"). Staff <br />became aware of the retaining wall through the City's Code Enforcement program in May 2020. The Applicant has <br />stated that the intent of the fill was to address erosion occurring in their back yard. There may have been erosion <br />issues along the trail, but the City does not have any documentatio f this item. This is one potential solution to <br />this issue amongst other alternatives (some requiring fill, some not)7=e end of the day, the Property Owner has <br />the ability to make this request to the City for consideration. The City can choose to approve or deny at this point. <br />Staff is comfortable with any solution so long as said solution meeting applicable requirements. <br />In addition to working through alternatives with the Property Owner, Staff has been seeking guidance from the <br />Minnesota DNR office in terms of floodplain regulations and options. This is a very complex case that includes <br />numerous layers of government regulation. <br />This step is the result of the Settlement Conference related to the Code Enforcement Case. The City is attempting to <br />find a compromise. The intent of tonight is not to debate the boundaries of floodplain or conservation easement. <br />This case is focused on the Flood lain encroachment. In addition, this area is encumbered by a Conservation and <br />Trail Easement held by the City secured with a grant form the State of Minnesota, prior to the development of the <br />Brookfield Neighborhood. The ity Council will address the easement encroachment issue when they receive the <br />case for review. If approved, partial repayment back to the Legislative -Citizen Commission on Minnesota <br />Resources would be required. <br />While this individual case may have minor implications to floodplain and Conservation Easement, it does open the <br />door to a number of other requests. Once the City has a better handle on updated floodplain modeling (current <br />model is dated in the 1970s and is now inaccurate), Staff plans on holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss <br />broader options while still maintaining a majority of the floodplain and Conservation Easement. <br />Notification: <br />Staff has sent notifications to Property Owners within 350 feet of the Subject Property as indicated by Anoka <br />County Property Records via Standard US Mail. A Public Hearing was included in the Anoka County UnionHerald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Property Information <br />The Subject Property is a single family home in the Brookfield Neighborhood, in the 8th Addition. This home abuts <br />the Trott Brook Corridor to the North, which is encumbered by a Conservation and Trail Easement and has <br />floodplain (floodway). Homes in the Brookfield 8th Addition (final phase) homes smaller backyard space compared <br />to other parcels in the neighborhood due to the Conservation and Trail Easement as well as Floodplain. The <br />Homeowners put in a retaining wall within the Floodplain and Easement without specific City approval. In 2019, <br />prior to construction, Staff had forwarded applicable restrictions to a contractor working on behalf of the Property <br />l n ci I Ccio� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.