My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 05/11/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:58:39 PM
Creation date
5/25/2021 11:34:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/11/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 05/ 11 /2021 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #21-13 8 Relieving Property Owners of Reimbursement Requirement for Conservation and Trail <br />Easement Partial Vacation Associated with Retaining Wall at 7349 168th Cir NW; Case of Jodell and John Seaman <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a final settlement agreement with John and JoDell Seaman (the <br />"Homeowners") for an encroachment into a Conservation and Trail Easement along Trott Brook in the Brookfield <br />Neighborhood. This is the final step in a three -step process. <br />1. Settlement Agreement per Code Enforcement Case (approved Summer, 2020) <br />2. Floodplain Encroachment (approved by Council in November, 2020) <br />3. Conservation and Trail Easement Encroachment Requiring Easement Vacation and Partial LCCMR <br />Grant Reimbursement (Current Step) <br />Staff became aware of the retaining wall through the City's Code Enforcement program in May 2020. The <br />Applicant has stated that the intent of the fill was to address erosion occurring in their back yard. There may have <br />been erosion issues along the trail, but the City does not have any documentation of this item. This is one potential <br />solution to this issue amongst other alternatives (some requiring fill, some not). At the end of the day, the Property <br />Owner has the ability to make this request to the City for consideration. The City can choose to approve or deny at <br />this point. Staff is comfortable with any solution so long as said solution meeting applicable requirements. This is a <br />very complex case that includes numerous layers of government regulation. Staff has attached the November, 2020 <br />City Council case for more detailed background. <br />This step is the result of the Settlement Conference related to the Code Enforcement Case. The City is attempting to <br />find a compromise. The intent of tonight is not to debate the boundaries of floodplain or conservation easement. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />This case is focused on the Conservation and Trail Easement (previous approvals focused on Floodplain <br />Amendment, which was required in order to move onto this step). This easement was secured with a grant from the <br />State of Minnesota, prior to the development of the Brookfield Neighborhood. If approved, partial repayment back <br />to the Legislative -Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources would be required. The estimated cost ranges from <br />$500 to $2,000, depending on outcome of a required appraisal. The City Council will need to decide whether this <br />partial repayment is the responsibility of the City or the Homeowner that installed the improvement. <br />Staff has had difficulty finding a certified appraiser willing to do this required appraisal that meets the requirements <br />of the LCCMR Grant. Staff is now working with a third appraiser, and has requested that LCCMR Staff consider an <br />alternative scope for this minor encroachment. Staff is presenting a compromise solution that allows the <br />Homeowner to finalize the improvement while still retaining the ability to require reimbursement based on final <br />outcome of the LCCMR process. <br />While this individual case may have minor implications to floodplain and Conservation Easement, it does open the <br />door to a number of other requests. Now that Staff has a better handle on the process to vacate portions of the <br />Conservation and Trail Easement, Staff plans on holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss broader options while <br />still maintaining a majority of the floodplain and Conservation Easement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.