My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2021
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:33:29 AM
Creation date
6/11/2021 3:31:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/15/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove asked if the City website includes a listing of the roads and their <br />placement in the CIP. <br />City Engineer Westby confirmed that information is available on the City website. <br />3. APPROVE AGENDA <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to approve the <br />agenda, as presented. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Woestehoff and Musgrove. <br />Voting No: None. <br />4. APPROVE MINUTES <br />4.01: Approve March 16, 2021, Meeting Minutes <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to approve the <br />following minutes: <br />Regular Meeting Minutes dated March 16, 2021 <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Woestehoff and Musgrove. <br />Voting No: None. <br />5. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br />5.01: Consider Request to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement at 15730 Armstrong <br />Boulevard <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report and stated that both Engineering and <br />Public Works staff have stated a preference that the full right-of-way radius of 65 feet be provided <br />if the existing north -south drainage and utility easement is to be vacated. If the applicant does not <br />want to impact the subject property to that extent, then they would need to have the written consent <br />of the two adjacent property owners to impact their parcels with right-of-way. He stated that this <br />is a reaction to the request to release an asset the City currently has. Staff seems it reasonable to <br />ask for something in return and to ask for a full-size ROW in return. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that he would not be interested in having the properties to the north <br />provide land for the benefit of this property. He asked if this would only be constructed under a <br />reconstruction. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that only right-of-way would be taken at this time <br />rather than requiring the cul-de-sac improvement to be constructed. <br />Public Works Committee / April 20, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.