Laserfiche WebLink
opportunities to engage the community. He reviewed the other action items related to community <br />engagement and noted that staff suggests because those are more of everyday duties and processes, <br />those items should be considered as part of the organizational culture rather than listing them in <br />multiple places. The Council agreed. He confirmed the consensus of the Council to keep the item <br />related to approving safety and mobility of the transportation corridors. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that no traction has been gained with the County related to the CR 5 <br />corridor. He confirmed that the item has been included on the plan for more than one year. He <br />explained that as development proposals come forward, they include a portion of improvement to <br />CR 5 as needed to support the development. He explained that the study looks at the corridor as a <br />whole to project needs for the future and development projects impact how long the study will be <br />accurate for the corridor, therefore it is important to get the timing right for when the study is done. <br />He stated that the County offered to assist with the study but noted that the County has other <br />priorities at this time as well, including Highway 10. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the study will take into account the future land use. He noted <br />that a consultant study would use some staff time and hoped that the County could cost share that <br />study. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed the consensus of the Council to keep the CR 5 <br />corridor within the plan. He stated that staff would suggest moving the Highway 47 study to the <br />parking lot and confirmed the consensus of the Council. He provided a recommendation for a new <br />strategy to enhance the priority street light plan in order to improve lighting intersections and <br />promote pedestrian safety. He moved to the next strategy related to a connected community and <br />additional background information was provided with the intent behind that strategy. He stated <br />that perhaps the overarching strategy would be to divide that into two categories, the first on the <br />park land and connectivity and the second being related to recreational programming. He also <br />confirmed consensus of the Council to have a strategy to complete parks capital maintenance plan <br />for existing parks. He referenced the customer service process improvement strategy and <br />confirmed consensus to move that under organizational culture. He noted an additional action that <br />could be added to review existing metrics and the system to track customer/resident interaction, <br />but it was the consensus of the Council to explore an interactive request feature under the website <br />strategy. He moved to the next strategy related to enhance sustainability and efficiency and the <br />Council direction was to change enhance to spotlight. He reviewed an additional action item <br />related to solar, electric charging stations and other opportunities but the Council did not support <br />adding that action item. He confirmed the consensus to keep the water treatment plant action item <br />within the plan. It was also confirmed that the new public works campus item can be removed as <br />that is already in progress. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill asked if there would be an appetite to setting aside City dollars <br />for open space preservation. He provided additional details on how Andover chose to preserve <br />open space areas through the use of levied dollars for that purpose. Staff provided additional <br />details on how the land would be protected and available for public enjoyment. It was the <br />consensus of the Council to explore the concept further. <br />City Council Special Work Session / May 18, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />