Laserfiche WebLink
taxes should be the method to fund the improvement. He stated that the benefit by the roads is <br />realized by those that own property. <br />Mr. Madden commented that he previously lived in Andover and received an assessment of <br />$4,000, which was spread over ten years and he believed to be a reasonable cost. He stated that <br />he did go to the City Council to complain about that assessment but still believed that an <br />assessment would be a more reasonable method of funding. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that there seems to be a concern about what the franchise fee is called. <br />He recognized that franchise fees are a tax and the Council agrees with that point. He stated that <br />funds have to be collected in one way or another and it is a tax. He stated that of the options <br />available, none are perfect and therefore they are trying to find the best method for the community. <br />Mr. Walker stated that he is glad to hear the Council admit that this would be a tax on the residents. <br />He stated that the Minnesota Supreme Court has already ruled on the fees that cities are charging <br />and are calling it a tax. He cautioned against collecting fees that could need to be paid back. He <br />stated that he believes that the Council will approve this, no matter the comments made tonight. <br />He believed that a five-year trial period is too long, as many of the members of the Council may <br />not be here in five years which means that there would not be accountability. He commented that <br />those that support this should need to be accountable. He stated that transparency is lost in <br />budgeting by using these types of fees and therefore people are not held accountable for the <br />decisions they make for the residents. <br />Mayor LeTourneau commented that the ordinance could be introduced and passed by the Council. <br />He asked if the Council would have the power to rescind the ordinance during that five-year period. <br />City Administrator Ulrich commented that as with any ordinance adopted by the Council, the <br />Council can change or modify the ordinance at any time. He explained that the reason for the five- <br />year review is to keep the accountability. <br />Mayor LeTourneau commented that the assessment policy was done in the same manner, with a <br />five-year trial period. He stated that the Council will continue to state that this is a transparent tax <br />that will be used as dedicated funding for roads. He stated that he would be open to having a <br />discussion of how that could be made better. <br />Chelsea Howell, 5250 156th Ln NW, stated that she agrees with the comments made thus far that <br />a franchise fee is a regressive tax. She did not believe now is the time to burden people with <br />additional taxes. She stated that she is concerned for the residents that have already paid <br />assessments and asked for details on how those residents would be impacted. <br />Finance Director Lund provided additional clarification on what those residents would be eligible <br />for. <br />Ms. Howell stated that she does not feel it is fair to double tax people. She stated that the majority <br />of what residents want should be taken into consideration and noted that everyone tonight has <br />spoken against this idea. <br />City Council / July 14, 2020 <br />Page7of18 <br />