Laserfiche WebLink
Highlights from March 9, 2021 City Council Work Session (2.04: Review and Discuss the <br />Remote Attendance Policy) <br />• Administrative Services Director Lasher reviewed the staff report. <br />• Councilmember Riley asked how the City would know when the pandemic has ended. <br />• City Administrator Ulrich stated that would refer to the emergency declaration by the <br />Governor. <br />• Councilmember Woestehoff referenced the public remote attendance noting that can be <br />challenging for staff but appreciates that it provides additional opportunity for residents <br />to participate. He suggested that perhaps that be allowed to continue for six months post - <br />pandemic and then be reviewed after that time. <br />• Councilmember Specht agreed that he would like to see the limitations put back in place <br />following the pandemic. He stated that he also agreed that this should be left open to <br />allow remote attendance for the public. <br />• Mayor Kuzma asked for input from staff. <br />• Deputy City Administrator Gladhill provided details on the staff work that is necessary <br />for remote attendance. He stated that QCTV is available for residents to watch the <br />meeting broadcast live and asked if the remote element would be desired for participation <br />as well. He noted that if participation is desired, there should be additional consideration <br />for IT needs. <br />• Mayor Kuzma asked if there are additional CARES Act funds that would be available for <br />equipment needs. <br />• Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that additional funds may be available <br />but believed that was slated for staff time and ongoing resources rather than equipment. <br />• Councilmember Musgrove recognized that Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stays late <br />to assist with remote meetings and asked if IT staff is also staying late. She asked if staff <br />is being compensated for that time. She noted that some of the items in the policy are <br />being waived because of the emergency declaration. She stated that she would like to <br />return to normal as soon as possible as there is no guidance from the Governor as to how <br />long this will go on. <br />• Councilmember Heineman asked when the pandemic would be considered over. He <br />stated that he liked the recommendation of staff and suggested that this be reviewed in <br />three to six months rather than linking this to the pandemic terminology because that is <br />ambiguous. <br />• Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that people are getting more comfortable <br />as more people become vaccinated. He noted that some Commission members will not <br />be comfortable returning until more people are vaccinated. He stated that staff can <br />continue to engage the Commission members to determine their level of comfort for in <br />person meetings. <br />• Councilmember Howell suggested that this policy be brought back in three to four <br />months to determine what works for the City and removing the language that muddy the <br />waters related to the pandemic. <br />• Councilmember Heineman agreed that the tiineframe would allow the evaluation to be <br />based on the City and conditions and comfort levels at that time rather than linking it to <br />restrictions. He suggested this be reviewed in 90 days. <br />