My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/18/2021 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 05/18/2021 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:59:23 PM
Creation date
7/14/2021 8:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
05/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as <br />lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. <br />To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services <br />were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively <br />lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest <br />perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of <br />both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher <br />quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. <br />Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 65% or more of respondents were considered of "higher quality" and <br />those with ratings lower than 65% were considered to be of "lower quality." Services were classified as "more important" if they <br />were rated as essential or very important by 76% or more of respondents. Services were rated as "less important" if they <br />received a rating of less than 76%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in <br />half. <br />The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (up -down) and <br />which had higher or lower quality ratings (right -left). Services categorized as higher in importance and lower in quality may <br />warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary. <br />IMPORTANCE <br />- Economy <br />- Mobility <br />- Community Design <br />- Inclusivity and Engagement <br />-Education, Culture, and the <br />Arts <br />- Safety <br />- Natural Environment <br />- Parks and Recreation <br />- Utilities <br />- Health and Wellness <br />QUALITY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.