Laserfiche WebLink
City Administrator Ulrich clarified that if land is purchased in this manner, it could not be sold for a future <br />purpose and would be dedicated similarly to park land. He stated that the property would not generate <br />taxes but would also preserve areas from development. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that he would support that concept as the land could not be <br />sold for another use in the future. He believed that most residents would support that type of use, as <br />long as the intent is clearly communicated. He stated that there is a "park" on Variolite that he would <br />consider a good concept of open space. He stated that perhaps this could provide funding to protect land <br />sources of that nature that have a value outside of development. <br />Councilmember Specht commented that he could support this if it is put on the ballot and supported by <br />residents. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if there would be a provision that would protect the residents from <br />having to purchase property because a neighbor wants the vacant lot next to them protected. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that the City would make the choice on which properties <br />to acquire most likely choosing properties that rank highly on the natural resources inventory. The Council <br />supported further exploring the concept. He confirmed the consensus to keep the overarching strategy <br />to strengthen and enhance the overall brand of the City. He stated that perhaps image is added to make <br />the strategy more well-rounded. He confirmed agreement to keep the zip code strategy and summarized <br />some of the advisory comments. <br />