Laserfiche WebLink
encroachment. Secondly, that Lots 3-5 will be restricted to a single driveway access point (the zoning district would <br />allow for two access points) to eliminate future encroachments. Finally, that culverts are placed under the three (3) <br />driveways to ensure ecological connectivity between the wetlands. <br />When contemplating a variance, a three (3) factor test must be applied to determine practical difficulties: <br />1. Reasonableness - The project is reasonable, as it is proposing nine (9) total lots over ninety-four (94) acres of <br />land, of which, about thirty (30) acres is wetland. The proposed impacts of the three (3) driveways on actual <br />wetland area is only 270 square feet, which is under the de minimus exemption outlined in the Wetland <br />Conservation Act (WCA). It may be possible to add more fill within the wetland areas and still remain within <br />the de minimus exemption; however, that does seem contradictory to the purpose of the WCA. <br />2. Uniqueness - There are unique conditions applicable to the Subject Property. Approximately 1/3 of the <br />Subject Property is encumbered with wetland and floodplain. The Applicant has proposed a project that <br />really does minimize impacts to natural resources. Access to the larger, buildable areas of Lots 3-5 (where <br />encroachment in the form of fill, sod, etc.) is obstructed due to the location of several small, pocket wetlands, <br />and the required wetland setback. The project is attempting to minimize impacts to existing natural site <br />conditions (wetlands, flood plain, tree cover). <br />3. Essential Character - The proposed subdivision would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. In <br />fact, the project includes far fewer lots than would be allowed by City Code. The current configuration has <br />the least impact to existing site conditions and includes lot sizes more compatible with surrounding <br />properties. Furthermore, it is consistent with the community's desire to retain rural character. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1: Recommend approval of the requested variance to wetland setback requirements on Lots 3-5 to <br />accommodate driveway access to building sites. Locating the house pads north of the small, pocket wetlands (but <br />south of the large wetland complex) provides more wide open space for future homeowners to establish a 'usable' <br />yard without inadvertently filling wetland area. Overall, this project has strived to limit impacts to natural resources <br />and attempted to retain rural character by proposing fewer total lots, that by and large, far exceed minimum lot size. <br />Staff supports this alternative. <br />Alternative 2: Recommend denial of the variance. Should the requested variance be denied, the Applicant would <br />need to revise the Preliminary Plat to eliminate encroachment into the wetland setback areas on Lots 3-5. The <br />proposed impacts from the three (3) driveways fall under the de minimus exemption regarding actual wetland <br />impacts. The location of the small, pocket wetlands restrict access to the larger, buildable areas on these lots, where <br />there is much less likelihood of wetland encroachments by the future homeowners. Staff does not support this <br />alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this request. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend approval of the requested variance to deviate from the wetland setback requirement on Lots <br />3-5, Block 1 Williams Woods. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Applicant Summary of Variance Request <br />Wetland Setback Exhibits for Lots 3-5 <br />Resolution #21-203: Draft Variance <br />