Laserfiche WebLink
2020 <br />Survey <br />o <br />lD <br />N <br />Survey <br />Ni <br />M <br />NA <br />+ <br />< <br />Survey <br />%001 <br />1 Year Lag <br />00 <br />co <br />co <br />a) <br />r-1 <br />Survey <br />4 <br />Lf <br />ISO 4/7 <br />L <br />N <br />coO <br />lD <br />r-1 <br />O <br />r1 <br />O <br />M <br />N <br />of <br />LC, <br />6.43 <br />Survey <br />m <br />m <br />N <br />Ql <br />if). <br />o <br />O� <br />NLc) <br />Survey <br />Survey <br />$1,123 <br />>- <br />a) <br />i <br />Ln <br />0 <br />cn <br />r-I <br />o <br />o <br />lD <br />00 <br />C31r-I <br />Ln+ <br />m <br />< <br />%001 <br />11.59/21.24 <br />0 <br />M <br />Survei. <br />5:42 <br />ISO 4/7 <br />r-1 <br />o0 <br />15.3 <br />.1 <br />20.8 <br />Lo <br />Lb <br />I� <br />LD <br />Survey <br />N <br />oo <br />I� <br />110 <br />o o <br />.N—I <br />0 <br />N <br />L <br />L <br />LIDN <br />,�-1 <br />in- <br />Survey <br />0 <br />2018 <br />Survey <br />o <br />o <br />rl <br />NO <br />o <br />c <br />+ <br />Q <br />Survey <br />%001 <br />Ln <br />N <br />,--i <br />N <br />N <br />al <br />26%/63% <br />(44.5% ave.) <br />Cr) <br />LD <br />ISO 4/7 <br />CD <br />00 <br />0 <br />N <br />LSD. <br />0 <br />O <br />CV <br />Ln <br />00 <br />�—i <br />1 <br />LSD <br />to <br />N <br />Lc; <br />Survey <br />$52,009 <br />d <br />o <br />LP <br />oo <br />v <br />i <br />( <br />Q- <br />i <br />c <br />4 <br />N <br />i/- <br />Survey <br />0 <br />Measures 2020 <br />2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <br />Survey Survey Survey Survey Survey <br />-0.74% 12.76% 4.50% 5.07% 6.18% <br />Survey Survev SurvPv Survev <br />Lam() <br />O <br />m <br />+ <br />< <br />Q <br />%001 %001 I %001 : %001 , %001 <br />Ln <br />N <br />N <br />L6 <br />H <br />o <br />lfl <br />'l' <br />L <br />N <br />4 <br />O <br />c/') <br />c.�° <br />m <br />N <br />00 <br />14.46 <br />O <br />M <br />r-1 <br />O <br />M <br />r1 <br />O <br />Cc; <br />O <br />N <br />IN <br />Survey <br />i $46,009 <br />N <br />00 <br />00 <br />LD <br />Survey <br />Survey <br />$1,017 <br />Survey Survey <br />0 <br />0LCD <br />0 <br />Ln <br />r1 <br />+ <br />Q <br />< <br />13.47/24.21 <br />o <br />NI <br />Ln <br />Survey <br />3:23 <br />in <br />O <br />_ <br />- <br />2 <br />L <br />LCD <br />N <br />00 <br />N <br />•r-I <br />r1 <br />0 <br />• V) <br />0 <br />LD <br />N <br />% -1 <br />Ln <br />LD <br />u1 <br />m <br />IN <br />>, <br />> <br />�` <br />O <br />of <br />Ln <br />lto <br />o <br />N <br />r1 <br />to <br />00 <br />Survey <br />917L$ <br />0 <br />oo <br />4 <br />r1 <br />+ <br />Q <br />m <br />Ln <br />N <br />Ln <br />.4NI <br />H <br />* <br />Lc. <br />Survey <br />m <br />m <br />I <br />r, <br />, <br />Ln <br />0 <br />') <br />>-, <br />Q0- <br />N <br />00 <br />12.46 <br />O <br />l0 <br />r1 <br />L(1 <br />Ln <br />L() <br />L <br />m <br />LD <br />0 <br />Lnc <br />I- <br />Survey <br />i $41,700 <br />of <br />0 <br />N <br />00 <br />Survey <br />N <br />01 <br />of <br />t/} <br />Survey <br />O <br />0 4 <br />e-IQ <br />+ <br />LC. <br />H <br />N <br />\ <br />p <br />vi <br />46% <br />-vey <br />No Data <br />, <br />O <br />N <br />Survey <br />N <br />r-1 <br />00 <br />L <br />O <br />N <br />4.70 <br />L <br />00 <br />CO <br />O <br />r< <br />Survey <br />i$10,628 <br />o <br />r1 <br />LD <br />0- <br />Survey <br />Survey <br />i$1,011 <br />Survey Survey <br />o <br />N <br />01 <br />+ <br />Q <br />< <br />m <br />m <br />N <br />o <br />r-I <br />Ln <br />-vey <br />No Data <br />O <br />- <br />, <br />1 <br />N <br />00 <br />10.98 <br />34.00 <br />4.56 <br />LIDIA <br />N <br />O <br />N <br />1- <br />Survey <br />$1,350 <br />o <br />00 <br />O <br />00 <br />>, <br />L <br />Survey <br />$1,080 <br />0 <br />Ramsey: Standard <br />Measure 2012 <br />Sting of the overall quality of services provided by your city Survey <br />-7.82% <br />Survey <br />r-I <br />M <br />Lis <br />+ <br />Q <br />< <br />%001 <br />22.20/26.30 <br />c <br />vey <br />lD <br />m <br />CO <br />Lr) <br />0 <br />v) <br />Survey <br />Ln <br />O <br />CO <br />NO <br />m• <br />O <br />of• <br />N <br />O <br />L(1 <br />N <br />0.34 <br />O <br />Ln <br />I- <br />Survey <br />$1,941 <br />o <br />r1 <br />O <br />O <br />00 <br />Survey <br />Survey <br />$895 <br />Survey <br />o <br />Percent change in the taxable property market value <br />-r <br />',t <br />av <br />s <br />0 <br />a <br />c. <br />£; <br />E. <br />�. <br />cc <br />a� <br />a< <br />0 <br />rc. <br />a <br />> <br />0 <br />a <br />0 <br />0 <br />0- <br />0 <br />M <br />c!) <br />0 <br />a,^ <br />r, <br />Nuisance code enforcement cases per 1,000 population <br />ember of library visits per 1,000 popul2tir° <br />CA <br />C <br />CO <br />i <br />-0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />CO <br />Citizens' rating of city recreational programs and facilities <br />Accuracy of post election audit (% of ballots counted accurately) <br />P I and II Crime Rates (per 1000) <br />Part I and II Crime Clearance Rates (per 1000) <br />ens' `ir n the comm <br />Average police response time (emergency calls) <br />Insurance industry rating of fire services <br />'tizens' rating of the quality of fire protection services <br />Average fire response time <br />Fire calls per 1,000 population <br />Number of fires with loss resulting in investigation <br />EMS calls per 1,000 <br />Emergency Medical Services average response time <br />Average city street pavement condition rating Paser Scale (1-10) <br />Citizens' rating of the road conditions in their City <br />Expenditures for road rehabilitation per paved lane mile rehab. Does not <br />include minor upkeep (pot holes, patching, etc.) <br />Percentage of all jurisdiction lane miles rehabilitated in the yr <br />Average hours to complete road system during snow event <br />Citizens' rating of the quality of snowplowing on city streets <br />Citizens' rating of water dependability and quality (survey) <br />Operating cost per 1,000,000 gallons of water pumped/produced <br />Citizens' rating of the dependability and quality of city sanitary sewer <br />291Number of sewer blockages on city system per 100 connections <br />r-I <br />N <br />M <br />Cr <br />LA <br />tD <br />1... <br />00 <br />01 <br />0 <br />r-I <br />r-I <br />r-I <br />N <br />r-I <br />M <br />r-1 <br />Cr <br />r-1 <br />111 <br />r-I <br />t0 <br />r-I <br />N <br />r-1 <br />00 <br />r-1 <br />01 <br />r-1 <br />0 <br />N <br />I -1 <br />N <br />N <br />N <br />M <br />N <br />iqr <br />N <br />111 <br />N <br />LID <br />N <br />N. <br />I N <br />00 <br />N <br />i <br />(o <br />is <br />0 <br />a <br />to <br />ii w <br />v1 <br />0 <br />cn <br />CB <br />'Sanitary <br />