Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #21-158 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT, <br />GRADING AGREEMENT AND SITE PLAN FOR OPPIDAN <br />WHEREAS, Oppidan Holdings, LLC hereafter referred to as "Developer," properly applied for <br />Site Plan, Grading Agreement, Final Plat approval of the following described property located in the City <br />of Ramsey: <br />Lot 2, Block 1 Amsterdam Extension, Anoka County, Minnesota (the `Subject <br />Property'); <br />WHEREAS, the City has received an Application for Site Plan Approval for three (3) industrial <br />lots and one outlot; and <br />WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the E-3 Industrial District; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission met and held a public hearing for the Site Plan on June 3, <br />2021 and recommended approval of the Site Plan and Plat; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Site Plan, Final Plat, and Grading Agreement on <br />June 22, 2021. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That the Ramsey City Council hereby grants final plat and development agreement approval for <br />Amsterdam Extension 2nd Addition in accordance with relevant City Codes, subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />a. Compliance with the Staff Review Letters. <br />b. Compliance with all Staff Review Comments in ProjectDox. <br />c. Final approval by City Engineer and City Attorney. <br />d. The Developer entering into a Development Agreement with the City. <br />e. Approved wetland delineation and 16.5 foot setback encumbered by easement. <br />f. The Developer entering into a trail easement for the City trail along the wetland <br />delineation on the north end of the site. <br />g. The Developer agreeing to a cost share agreement for Bunker Lake Boulevard road <br />improvements. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />RESOLUTION #21-158 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />