My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/22/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 06/22/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:01:47 PM
Creation date
7/19/2021 8:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/22/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
672
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tim Gladhill <br />From: Jeff Katers <br />Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 2:40 PM <br />To: Tim Gladhill <br />Subject: Response to Williams Woods Proposal <br />Tim, <br />The Police Department has concerns about this proposed development, specifically the extraordinary length of the cul <br />de sac and the single point of entry/exit to this development. The proposed cul de sac length is more than double <br />allowed by city code. The police department and other first responders (Fire, EMS, Gas/Electric utilities) have a need to <br />have more than 1 accesses to areas. <br />If the roadway is completely unpassable nearest 175th ave, how do you propose we get first responders to the other <br />residents 1/5 of a mile north? Police can achieve this by foot, but that is a long length to bring a stretcher or remove a <br />patient for EMS. We have responded to many calls for service in areas where roadways have become completely <br />impassible in Ramsey. Some examples are: fires, floods, downed power lines, downed trees, natural gas explosions, <br />vehicle crashes, trains blocking, etc. Thankfully, a majority of these calls have had another route of access. <br />If we can be assured the 9 homes are the only homes that will ever be built on this roadway the length of the cul de sac <br />might be more feasible. The concern is with potential future development with the larger two parcels on the north end <br />and their future use. It is not safe for a subdivision with multiple homes to have 1 vehicular point of entry exit. <br />My concerns are the same public safety concerns as with Bowers Dr. What is the Public benefit for not connecting this <br />road to another existing roadway? I believe connecting roadways is also a requirement of city code (117-614): <br />Sec. 117-614. Subdivision design standards. <br />(a) General requirements. The planning commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed <br />subdivision is in conformity with this Code and shall take into consideration the requirements of the community and the <br />best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage and <br />lot sizes and arrangements. <br />(b) Street plan. <br />(1) The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform to the approved <br />standard street specifications and all applicable sections of this Code. All streets shall be paved with concrete or <br />bituminous surfacing. <br />(2) The arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall connect to adjacent street stubs and provide future street <br />stubs to adjoining areas. In instances where a stub street abuts an undeveloped parcel, it is the stated intention of <br />the city to connect streets with the adjoining parcel for development. In the interim, the stub streets shall have a <br />sign stating that the stub street is a future through street. <br />reuitez4 <br />ates <br />ice Cif :ry ;of Ranasei <br />SunI iv <br />-'': <br />r °tit } as <br />11� <br />76342741912 1Lce Dept) <br />7 2 2361(Fax) <br />'kith cl °ofI 1.°.cGill <br />Potire , s lo prated and serve milk courage,intro* end honor. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.