My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:53:13 PM
Creation date
7/22/2005 3:48:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/26/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. That the preliminary plat is proposing 59% private open space as part of the development,i:~ <br /> which exceeds the 50% private open space area requirement established in City Code. <br /> <br />10. That the proposed development will exercise substantial detrimental influence ~h <br /> market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />11. That the proposed development will not show a favorable economic <br /> community at large. -,~;:~?,~:, <br /> <br />12. That the proposed development will adversely impact natural featur6}~' sud~..i.as Wetlands, <br /> water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. ~'~ ....~:~,~ ~ ~'~'. .... z,?'~' <br /> <br />13. That the proposed development will not protect and prese~e s ...... qua~{~ies to the ~eatest <br /> extent possible. ;::~;~ ~:%~:, ' <br /> <br />14. That the proposed development will ~mpose undue burden on~ubhc: seduces and fac~hties, <br /> including fire and police protection, schools, streets, 7~s, sa~ta~ sewer systems <br /> and sto~ sewer systems. ~::x ?:~ <br /> <br />15. ~at the proposed development is not desired 'ifi:i~spch h:%ay as to fo~ a desirable and <br /> unified enviroment within its own boundad~?:~4~:~alm will be detrimental to ~mre land <br /> uses in the su~ounding areas. <br /> <br />NOWTHEREFO~ BE IT ~SOL~D THAT T~ CITY COUNCIL DOES NOT FIND <br />THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS ~OM CITY CODE ACCEPTABLE: <br /> <br />l. That the following deviations from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this PUD; <br /> smaller lot sizes, narrower I~t"~idths, reduced building setbacks, and a public street that <br /> exceeds 600 feet in length. ~?!5. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foreg6ing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon'Vote b~i~g taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and thc following Voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the RamseY City Council <br />this the __ day of May 2005. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-xx-xxx <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.