Laserfiche WebLink
That the applicant appeared before the Ramsey Planning Commission for a public hearing <br />pursuant to Section 9.03.05of the City Code on July 7, 2005 and that said public hearing was <br />properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a <br />part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />6. That the Applicant's approved plan consisted of exporting a total of approximately 200,000 <br /> yards of earth material. <br /> <br />7. That thc Applicant has stated that the estimated completion date to export the remaining earth <br /> material is August 31,2005, and is therefore requesting a 90 (ninety) day permit. <br /> <br />That the City Engineer inspected the Subject Property on July 1, 2005 and determined the <br />following: a) the perimeter of the excavation needs to be reshaped to a 4:1 slope; and b) the <br />Applicant is not in total compliance with the phasing plan that requires' all but a maximum of <br />5 acres of'excavation area to be established with turf. <br /> <br />9. That thc Applicant has stated that the proposed haul route for incoming and outgoing trucks <br /> will be ti'om the site directly north for a distance of 1,200 feet to County Road #63. <br /> <br />~0. That no fill materials, except topsoil for restoration, are proposed to be imported to the site. <br /> <br />That no blasting will be employed in the grading activity. <br /> <br />12. That the existing drainage patterns will not be substantially altered by the proposed grading <br /> plan. <br /> <br />13. That the plan proposes to maintain silt fence along the perimeter of Wetland. <br /> <br />14.. That thc grading operation will increase the traffic to and from the subject property for the <br /> period of time the permit is in effect. <br /> <br />I5. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br /> residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br /> value of surrounding property. <br /> <br />17. That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br /> LISTS. <br /> <br />18. That thc proposed use will not be a substantial improvement to property in the immediate <br /> vicinity and to the community as a whole. <br /> <br />lc). That thc proposed use will not be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br /> highways and streets. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-07- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />