Laserfiche WebLink
that leaves Lot 3 with no current public access. She advised that Outlot A, in combination with <br />an easement the City previously received from Waltek to the south, with provide for the future <br />extension of 144th Avenue NW, west of Sunfish Lake Boulevard. She indicated development of <br />I,ot 3 cam~ot happen without the extension and construction of 144th Avenue NW, and City Staff <br />wi. ll yeti t~, that the easement received from Waltek for the future road corridor has been recorded. <br /> <br /> Case #8 <br /> Ramsey <br /> <br /> Presentation <br /> <br /> Recycling and Zoning Coordinator Anderson stat'ed :h~he <br /> there wats a public hearing regarding the prop( <br /> Ordinance revisions reflecting the <br />· incorporated into the draft. <br /> <br />Consider Revisions to Proposed Wetland Buffer Ordinance; Case of City of <br /> <br />Recycling and Zoning Coordinator Anderson <br />to StafFs attention that the proposed ordinance did not <br />buffer edge. Ifc stated this could pose a <br />particular lot. Ite indicated Staff <br />determined that a setback of some distance: wds <br />Fire Marshall recommended a thirty <br />based on that recommendation and di~Us.Sions:?Wi~ <br />proposing a minimum structure setback from a 15~er <br /> <br />Recycling and Zoning Coordinat0~'.Anderson <br />Fire Marshall, who was okay with the fifteen foot s <br /> <br /> Cc meeting <br /> H~,~indicated the <br /> i;~have been <br /> <br /> revision process, it came <br /> setback from the <br /> any usable yard on a <br />iire Mars garding this matter <br /> and <br /> fire safety purposes. He stated the <br /> buffer edge. He advised that <br /> :ntal Policy Board, Staff is <br /> feet. <br /> <br />this recommendation back to the . <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the setback i.S;.frQm the buffer edge or the wetland. <br /> <br />Recycling and Zoning Coordinator ~rfd~'~$;n:Tindicated it is from the buffer edge, which is in <br />addition to the buffer setback. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that since the buffer setback is 50 feet, they could be looking at a 65 foot <br />setback. · <br /> <br />Recycling an4 Zoning CoordinatOr Anderson indicated that was correct for the highest quality <br />delineated wetlands. He stated they anticipate an average buffer would be 30 feet, so this would <br />create a 45 foot separation. He indicated there may be areas where the buffer would be out <br />further and they could have a 65 foot setback, but they believe that will not be the case on most <br />lots. <br /> <br />Recycling and Zoning Coordinator Anderson advised both the Environmental Policy Board and <br />City Staff felt that the inclusion of a structure setback was a significant enough change from the <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 7, 2005 <br /> Page 14 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />