My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:53:13 PM
Creation date
7/22/2005 3:48:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/26/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Manage 3 wetlands have been substantially disturbed; replacement <br /> considerations can be minimized after proper sequencing. <br /> <br />eo <br /> <br />"Incidental" wetlands that are exempt from WCA regulation under Minn. <br />Rules 8420.0122 are not subject to the provisions of this Section. <br /> <br />Temporary impacts from utility installation or maintenance that are <br />exempt from WCA regulation under Minnesota Rules 8420.0122 are not <br />subject to the provisions of this Section. <br /> <br />If an applicant disputes the management classification of a wetland, the <br />applicant shall have the burden to supply detailed information for review <br />supporting the applicant's assertion, including but not limited to, <br />topographic, hydrologic, floristic and/or soil data deemed necessary to <br />determine its management classification. If the City is convinced by <br />evidence submitted by an applicant that a wetland on the municipal <br />wetland management classification map has been incorrectly mapped or <br />has been misclassified, the map will be changed to reflect the necessary <br />corrections. All such corrections are subject to City Council approval. <br /> <br />If an applicant questions the exact boundary of a wetland, the <br />jurisdictional status of a wetland, or whether a wetland exists, they shall <br />have the burden to supply detailed information, for review by the LGU, <br />supporting the applicant's assertion, including but not limited to, <br />topographic, hydrologic, floristic and/or soil data deemed necessary. <br /> <br />9.26.1}5 General Standards. The following standards apply to all lands within and/or <br />abuttiag a wetland: <br /> <br /> Subd. 1. Septic and soil absorption systems must be setback a minimum of <br />seventy-five (75) feet from the City approved boundary of the wetland. <br /> <br /> Subd. 2. The MPCA's Best Management Practices shall be followed for the <br />construction of wetland protection methods and related improvements. <br /> <br />9.26.t}6 <br /> <br />Wetland Buffer Strips <br /> <br /> Subd. 1.'A wetland buffer strip shall be maintained abutting all wetlands on new ' <br />lots of~ record created after [date of ordinance]. Lots of record in existence on [date of ordinance] <br />are not subject to the buffer requirements set forth in this Section. At the time a final plat is to be <br />recorded, the developer shall also record a notice of the wetland buffer requirement and <br />prohibited activities against the title to the lot with the office of the Anoka County Recorder. <br />Before the City issues a building permit for a lot with a required wetland buffer, the developer <br />shall install the wetland buffer monumentation. <br /> <br /> Subd. 2. Subject properties must comply with the wetland buffer ordinance <br />setbacks I~rom all wetlands including those wetlands not located or only partially located on the <br />subjcct property. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.