My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/12/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/12/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 11:41:46 AM
Creation date
8/9/2021 2:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
08/12/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that is put into the consideration for whether a playground should be replaced, improved, or <br />removed. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that the data from the school would provide a more realistic <br />number than estimating children per household. <br />Chair Bennett agreed that perhaps there is more of a range for density and if that density falls <br />within a certain range, then the school information is requested. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he would suggest using the age group of 12 and under rather <br />than the density estimate. <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that he agrees that additional information would be <br />helpful. He noted that perhaps density is made its own matrix with the school data and density <br />estimates in order to provide a more accurate projection. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that he likes that concept. He <br />noted that he would suggest a preliminary screening that would trigger the school survey <br />information. He noted number seven related to accessibility versus trails. He stated that <br />sometimes density may be met but the survey is still completed as it does not appear the area is <br />heavily populated with children. <br />Chair Bennett stated that if a playground is going to be removed it would be helpful to have the <br />information related to housing density, trail connections, and school data. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood agreed that it will be helpful to have <br />the policy and data in order to support decisions of that nature. He commented that sometimes <br />there are not sufficient children in an area to warrant a $100,000 investment in a neighborhood <br />park. <br />Councilmember Heineman stated that if a playground is removed, would there be continued <br />discussion as to what would happen with the park. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that would be part of the <br />discussion. <br />Chair Bennett stated that perhaps within the policy there should be some suggestions of what could <br />occur if a playground is removed. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that he plans to add <br />additional detail to that section. He noted that there should be some flexibility as some parks <br />simply do not warrant improvements. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that there is a park on Variolite that appears to be used for <br />parking construction vehicles. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/July 8, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.