Agenda - Council - 07/27/2021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Commissioner VanScoy commented that the only concern he would have with this use is aesthetically and would support a revision of Code to allow this activity as long as outdoor storage is limited and screened appropriately. Chairperson Bauer echoed the comments. He stated that if there have not been incubator businesses within the E-1 district, that section of the Code should be cleaned up. He stated that there are very industrial uses adjacent to this site but to the east the use is cleaner. He encouraged staff to work with the applicant and see if they can make it work. He agreed that screening would make this much more acceptable. He stated that access would also be easier for customers to bring their vehicles in for repair compared to the businesses located on Highway 10. Ms. Kirilaschok replied that the business is currently renting and has never had any issues with the landlord. She stated that they would be open to conditions the Commission may place upon the request and would be happy to meet conditions for screening and car covers for outdoor storage. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed the direction of the Commission for the E-1 district. She asked if the Commission would want staff to look into removing auto repair from the Highway 10 corridor to improve that aesthetic. Chairperson Bauer commented that it is often difficult to enter and exit those businesses. Commissioner Anderson commented that he would be opposed to adding new uses of those types but would be fine allowing the existing uses to continue operating as they are. Chairperson Bauer stated that perhaps the Commission review adding that use to other zoning districts to remove it from Highway 10 as that is not an ideal location. Commissioner VanScoy stated that he really does not see the need to eliminate that use, although he understands the issue of access. He stated that as Highway 10 is improved, that access would also improve. He noted that some of the businesses will have to move anyway as the Highway 10 improvements move forward and therefore did not see a need to remove that use from the district. He agreed that the Commission should review the possibility of expanding the districts in which the use is allowed, but with good control. Commissioner Gengler agreed with the comments of Commissioner VanScoy that the Commission should review other areas where the use may be appropriate. She stated that she would be inclined to not have new auto repair businesses allowed on Highway 10. Colton Brausen spoke in representation of the applicant and asked the timeline that the Commission would estimate, as his contract for the sale of the property would be contingent upon City approval. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that this would involve an ordinance change and CUP. She stated that this could be included on the June Commission meeting and if approved could go forward on the July Council meeting. Planning Commission/ May 6, 2021 Page 7 of 9