Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 7, 2, <br />Meeting Date: 07/27/2021 <br />By: Bria Raines, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #21-183 Denying an Easement Encroachment Agreement for an attached accessory structure in a <br />drainage and utility easement at 16206 Sapphire St NW; Case of William Cowette (Prof. 21-119) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City received a Building Permit Application for a deck to be constructed at 16206 Sapphire Street NW (the <br />"Subject Property") on August 15, 2017. The application was discussed and reviewed at the 8/22/2017 <br />Development Review meeting. The application for a 14' deep deck that is 35' in length deck was denied. The <br />property survey contains a "future deck" location outside of the drainage and utility easement (the "Easement"), <br />whereas the application proposed a deck encroaching on the easement. In short, The Property Owner was aware of <br />the easements onsite, was denied a permit, and built the deck anyway. <br />The property owner installed the deck after the denial. A code enforcement case was opened in 2017. Due to staff <br />turnover, the case was not resumed until 2021. The Property Owner was contacted to apply for Easement <br />Encroachment Agreement or remove the deck for the work without a permit violation. The Property Owner has <br />chosen to apply for an Easement Encroachment Agreement to keep the deck. <br />Notification: <br />Notification is not required when considering an Encroachment Agreement. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Property Owner is applying for an Easement Encroachment Agreement for the deck plans that were originally <br />denied in 2017. The house is built 0.9 feet from the easement and the deck is within the easement. A wetland is in <br />the easement and rear property. The deck does not encroach on the wetland. Planning Staff recommends approval <br />of Resolution 21-183 denying the Easement Encroachment Agreement; authorizing the existing deck to be removed <br />with contingency that Property Owner will be assessed for hiring a contractor should the deck not be removed in 60 <br />days. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends denying the Easement Encroachment Agreement to allow a deck to be located within the <br />Easement on the Subject Property. <br />Action: <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #21-183 denying an Easement Encroachment Agreement for an attached accessory <br />structure in a drainage and utility easement at 16206 Sapphire St NW <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Property Survey <br />