Laserfiche WebLink
that need further discussion, should be modified, or removed. He explained the different levels of <br />the goals, strategies and actions of the Strategic Plan and the related timeframe in which that should <br />cover. He reviewed the first high level strategy and stated that it seems there is strong consensus <br />of the Council to keep that statement. He stated that Councilmember Musgrove proposed to add <br />the language “while maintaining and increasing transparency and accountability” and asked for <br />input from the Council as to whether to keep the item as written or add the additional language. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that staff understands their workloads better than the Council <br />and was unsure that the Council would need oversight but agreed that transparency would help on <br />a high level to explain to the Council why things work better or would provide more efficiency or <br />cost-savings. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill suggested dropping accountability from the language, <br />focusing more on transparency. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove confirmed she would support that. She agreed that she does not want <br />to get in the way of staff. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill polled the Council and there was consensus to leave the <br />language as originally written and not add the additional suggestion from Councilmember <br />Musgrove. He reviewed the additional action items identified from the staff survey and confirmed <br />the consensus of the Council to add those items. He reviewed the strategy related to the pavement <br />management plan and asked if that should remain in the plan. He stated that the discussion tonight <br />should not focus on the franchise fee or pavement management plan but whether to leave the item <br />in the plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that this item was already accomplished and did not expect to <br />see it remain. He stated that pavement management is an important area, but he believed the item <br />was accomplished and should be removed. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that the language could also be changed from <br />implement a pavement management plan to evaluate the current pavement management plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she was glad to see that the item was still on the plan <br />because it would provide an opportunity for discussion with the new Council. She stated that she <br />would like the item to remain. She stated that there is a difference of opinion on how to fund the <br />roads, whether that be done through the tax levy or franchise fee. She asked when the conversation <br />would happen related to the road funding options. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that the Strategic Plan helps to populate the future <br />worksession discussion topics based on priority. He acknowledged that this is an important <br />discussion topic for the Council. He stated that perhaps discussions would occur along with the <br />budget discussions which begin in July. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she feels this is very important and would want to <br />begin discussions before the budget discussions begin. <br />City Council Special Work Session / May 18, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br />