My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:09:06 AM
Creation date
8/20/2021 10:07:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/26/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
access could be restricted, and public access could be considered as trespassing. He stated that the <br />concern of finding area for parking is different from if it were a dedicated park. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that at some point the property owner may wish to do something else <br />with that property. <br />Mr. Kurak stated that the purpose of purchasing the property was to make a park and donate it to <br />the City. He commented that he does have raw land experience and he negotiated with the previous <br />farm owner to purchase his farm property. He stated that he does have experience dedicating land <br />to the City for public purpose. He stated that he would eventually like to dedicate the land to the <br />City. He stated that he would sign an agreement to such if it meant gaining access and a parking <br />lot. <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that if the land were sold in the future for development, would the <br />easement need to be a certain size to allow other uses. <br />City Planner Anderson commented that the entire 40 acres is wetland and therefore is not <br />developable short of a boardwalk type trail. He stated that short of going through costly wetland <br />mitigation it does not appear developable. He stated that the case tonight is related to the variance, <br />and he would be happy to continue the discussion with the property owner offline. He noted that <br />the Preliminary Plat was already reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council and therefore the Commission is beyond that point of discussion. He noted that staff and <br />the City Attorney could continue discussions with the property owner related to his easement <br />request. <br />Commissioner Walker asked how the property owner has been accessing the property for the past <br />20 years if it is landlocked. <br />Mr. Kurak identified trails from the north that he and others have used to access the property. He <br />noted that even though the property is landlocked, it is attractive, and people still visit the area. <br />He stated that he is sad to hear that Preliminary Plat was approved without at least including a <br />cartway to his property. <br />Motion by Commissioner Peters, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to close the public hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Peters, VanScoy, Anderson, <br />Dunaway, and Walker. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Gengler. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:33 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that this is a good alternative to adding fill to the wetland. <br />Planning Commission/ July 22, 2021 <br />Page 11 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.