My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:09:06 AM
Creation date
8/20/2021 10:07:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/26/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet of property boundary adjacent to impacted use: <br />.8 overstory trees <br />. 8 evergreen trees <br />.8 understory trees <br />. Vegetative Buffer "B" with a berm - a minimum 35 feet in width in common ownership with the following planting <br />schedule per 100 feet of property boundary adjacent to impacted use: <br />.4 overstory trees <br />. 4 evergreen trees <br />.4 understory trees <br />If vegetative buffer "B" is utilized, the berm shall not exceed six (6) feet in height and should be designed with aesthetic appeal, <br />including breaks and irregular groups of plantings. <br />The Site Plan does include a forty-five (45) foot wide corridor along the common lot line along the north and west property <br />boundaries. As proposed, it appears that it is included within each of the individual lots. Per City Code, this is supposed to be <br />held in common ownership, which helps eliminate restrictions placed on individual lots and future homeowners. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative #1: Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and the Zoning Amendment with the following <br />contingencies: <br />1. Zoning Amendment only to rezone the R-3 Residential (High Density) portion to R-2 Residential (Medium Density); <br />leaving the R-1 Residential (MUSA) - 80 as is. <br />2. Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />3. Full compliance with density transitioning standards <br />4. Anoka County Highway Department approval of second access onto Armstrong Boulevard (or, in lieu of that, a second <br />access to the existing local road network) <br />5. Modifications to ensure compliance with all bulk standards of the applicable zoning districts <br />The project represents a good transition to the existing residential neighborhoods to the north and west. Also, a second access, if <br />approved, addresses the concerns previously raised about a single point of access to this many homes. Staff supports this <br />alternative. <br />Alternative #2: Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Zoning Amendment as requested with the following <br />contingencies: <br />1. Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />2. Full compliance with density transitioning standards <br />3. Anoka County Highway Department approval of second access onto Armstrong Boulevard (or, in lieu of that, a second <br />access to the existing local road network) <br />4. Modifications to ensure compliance with all bulk standards of the applicable zoning districts <br />The City Council has already indicated that they do not support the rezoning from R-1 Residential (MUSA) - 80 to R-1 <br />Residential (MUSA) - 65. Staff does not support this alternative. <br />Alternative #3: Motion to recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat and Zoning Amendment. This action would indicate a <br />desire to see the Subject Property development in accordance with R-3 Residential (High Density) District standards, including a <br />density of 8-15 units per acre. The Planning Commission previously supported the requested CPA, and the public input received <br />during the Sketch Plan review indicated support for this style of development (compared to apartment buildings). Staff does not <br />support this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the Zoning Amendment to rezone the R-3 Residential (High Density) portion of the Subject <br />Property to R-2 Residential (Medium Density) but does not support rezoning the R-1 Residential (MUSA) - 80 area to R-1 <br />Residential (MUSA) - 65. Approval of the Zoning Amendment needs to be contingent upon approval of the CPA. <br />Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with the following contingencies (these have been incorporated into the draft <br />resolution): <br />. Approval of the Zoning Amendment to rezone R-3 Residential (High Density) to R-2 Residential (Medium Density) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.