Laserfiche WebLink
plan if there is a second access. He stated that he does not mind the mix of density as long as <br />transitioning is provided but is against the long cul-de-sac. <br />Mr. Jablonski stated that this property is challenging because of its shape. He stated that they have <br />communicated with the neighbor but first attempted to work with just the subject property and are <br />not aware of what may or may not come from discussions with other property owners. He noted <br />that they also want to be cautious about forcing additional traffic through a rural area. He stated <br />that there are no roads that align on the other side of Armstrong because of the fire station and <br />therefore it would be a challenge to provide an in and out access without acquiring more property. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that ideally it would be nice if the City could work with the <br />applicant on this as the ideal situation would be to have access through the City property. He asked <br />if there has been conversation about that concept. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that staff will be meeting to determine whether that would be viable. <br />He believed that the existing septic drain field may be in that location, but perhaps the City could <br />connect to municipal services which would eliminate the need for a drain field. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he fully supports that concept. He stated that if the City could <br />support this development, it would be a nice solution. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that based upon input received in previous discussions, people are <br />generally opposed to bringing additional traffic through existing residential neighborhoods. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that the Public Works Committee recently reviewed a request <br />to repave the fire station parking lot and confirmed that the drain field is located in that area being <br />discussed. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that there was a public workshop on a similar case with <br />attached townhome products in 2018 and the feedback was shared with Lennar prior to developing <br />their design. She highlighted the comment themes received in 2018. <br />Commissioner Dunaway asked the challenges to having a second access on Armstrong. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that Anoka County has to permit additional access <br />points and would likely only permit one access for the property. <br />Commissioner Dunaway commented that a lot of time and energy was spent discussing a nine -lot <br />subdivision with a long cul-de-sac and the property had one access. He stated that he would not <br />be comfortable with this many homes in a development with only one access, as there would be <br />over 100 homes in this development. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that formal response has not yet been received from Anoka County. <br />He stated that staff would attempt to work with the County to say that a viable second point of <br />access is needed because of the concerns of staff and the Commission. He recognized that it would <br />be difficult to match the roads on the other side of Armstrong. <br />