My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:09:06 AM
Creation date
8/20/2021 10:07:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/26/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
than these) allows for changes every 3 seconds, with no transitions or motion videos. Since these signs <br />are larger than currently allowed, the more restrictive regulation would prevail. <br />. The City allows larger than average signs under Section 117-519 (c), which notes that in the Armstrong <br />Boulevard Interchange Overlay District, signs are allowed to be 50 feet tall and 150 sq ft total. Signs are held <br />to a higher architectural standard here, requiring an architectural base. Should the City remove the additional <br />allowances for signs in this overlay to reduce the number of signs? <br />. Note: The Planning Commission has previously expressed concerns over "forests of signs" in the City. <br />The proposed digital display billboards allow for visibility on Highway 10 without individual signs for <br />each business. <br />. Should the City place stricter standards on Conditional Use Permits for oversized signage in the COR and <br />along Highway 10 and direct businesses/applicants towards the digital display billboards? <br />. Note: This would consolidate signage onto these central signs while maintaining the downtown feel in <br />the COR. <br />. Does the distance between signs seem sufficient? <br />. Note: Staff is attempting to limit the number of signs along Highway 10, but provide sufficient distance <br />between signs so that drivers would not see more than one sign at once along the Highway 10 corridor, <br />to reduce distraction. Under the proposed code, 3 signs would be permitted, one at each end, and one in <br />the center. <br />Attachments <br />Attached to this case is the entirety of the Sign Code (Division 8) with proposed changes, and the new section as a <br />standalone document. Please note the highlighted sections indicating areas where Staff would like direct feedback <br />from the Planning Commission. Also attached to this case is a list of items to consider which notes relevant <br />regulations from other cities in the area. <br />Funding Source: <br />Staff is handling this case as part of regular duties. One of the City's Planning Consultants, WSB, helped draft the <br />ordinance for the City. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide feedback on the draft ordinance and direct Staff to bring <br />the ordinance forward to City Council for final approval. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend the City Council introduce the ordinance. <br />Proposed Billboard Overlay (Allowed Sites) <br />Items to Consider and Research <br />Entire Sign Code with Proposed Changes <br />Proposed New Section: Digital Billboards <br />Inbox <br />Reviewed By <br />Bruce Westby Bruce Westby <br />Form Started By: Chloe McGuire Brigl <br />Final Approval Date: 08/19/2021 <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Date <br />08/19/2021 01:03 PM <br />Started On: 08/19/2021 09:43 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.